...create restrictions, was held- to be invalid by reason of the exemption of agricultural productions or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser. A similar case is that of Coiling v. Kansas City Stock Yards VOL. cxcvi — IS Opinion of the Court....

...create restrictions, was held to be invalid by reason of the exemption of agricultural productions or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser. A similar case is that of Coiting v. Kansas City Stock Yards VOL. cxcvi — 18 Opinion of the Court....

...create restrictions, was held to be invalid by reason of the exemption of agricultural productions or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser. A similar case is that of Colling v. Kansas City Stock Yards VOL. CXCVI — 18 Opinion of the Court....

...Montana hatten in ihren Anti-Trust-Gesetzen die Bestimmung aufgenommen, daß diese Gesetze „schall not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser". Andere Staaten, ua Nebraska nahmen Arbeiterorganisationen zwecks Erzielung höherer Löhne aus. (Die...

...terms, it was made applicable to certain persons and products, and inapplicable as to others, namely " agricultural products, or live stock, while in the hands of the producer or raiser." (See Connolly Case, infra.} It might be claimed, successfully, that such a statute deprives a person...

...terms, it was made applicable to certain persons and products, and inapplicable as to others, namely " agricultural products, or live stock, while in the hands of the producer or raiser." (See Connolly Case, infra.) It might be claimed, successfully, that such a statute deprives a person...

...lines, and of equally drastic character, but to which some demagogue added these words: "The provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products...while in the hands of the producer or raiser." The Supreme Court of the United States held 8 that this exception caused the act to deny the equal protection...

...embraced in these words as quoted in the opinion at page 554, near the bottom: "Section 9. The provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products...stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." This act shall not apply to, first, agricultural products in the hands of the producer or raiser; second,...

...on the other, may be inferred from the 9th section of the act of 1893, which says: "The provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products,...stock, while in the hands of the producer or raiser." After a few litigations under this act, the legislature proceeded to revise the law again by the act...

...the United States, by reason of the fact that by the, ninth section it declares that " the provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of producer or raiser." The Circuit Court held this section to be repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment...