 | 1903 - 1040 lapas
...suit, was condemned because of a section thereof that provided that the provisions of the act should not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser. In disposing of the question the court, at page 563, 184 US, page 691. 46 L. ed., and page 441, 22... | |
 | Indiana. Supreme Court, Horace E. Carter, Albert Gallatin Porter, Gordon Tanner, Benjamin Harrison, Michael Crawford Kerr, James Buckley Black, Augustus Newton Martin, Francis Marion Dice, John Worth Kern, John Lewis Griffiths, Sidney Romelee Moon, Charles Frederick Remy - 1903 - 796 lapas
...suit, was condemned because of a section thereof that provided that the provisions of the act should not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser. In disposing of the question the court, at page 563, said: "It is one thing to exert the power of taxation... | |
 | 1903 - 1256 lapas
...Connolly v. Sewer' Pipe Co.. 22 Sup. Ct. 431, 46 L. Ed. 070, the statute under consideration exempted agricultural products or live stock, while in the hands of the producer or raiser, from the operation of a statute against combinations in restraint of trade. Here, again, the classification... | |
 | M. Zralek - 1903 - 556 lapas
...Connolly v. Pipe Co. (22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 431), and held that by excepting "agricultural products and live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser," the act prohibiting restrictions to trade or commerce or of aids to commerce was repugnant to the provisions... | |
 | 1904 - 1082 lapas
...of forming a trust; but the 9th section of the act contained this exception, to wit: "The provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products...stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." In Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co. 184 US 541, 46 L. ed. 682, 22 Sup. Ct. Rep. 431, the Supreme Court... | |
 | Albion W. Small, Ellsworth Faris, Ernest Watson Burgess, Herbert Blumer - 1904 - 926 lapas
...and labor interests. For instance, the Illinois act of July I, 1893, provided that "the provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products...stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." In Connolly vs. Union Sewer Pipe Co.1 the court held that this exception clause .tainted the whole... | |
 | 1904 - 998 lapas
...prohibiting all combinations in restriction of competition or trade, which exempts from its provisions agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer, violates such provision of the Constitution. In re Grice (TJ. S.) 79 Fed. 627, 645. And an act providing... | |
 | Vermont. Supreme Court - 1905 - 562 lapas
...a misdemeanor to be punished by a heavy fine. It was further provided therein that "The provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products...stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." It appears from the discussion of the case by the Court, that so far as the statute was concerned two... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1905 - 700 lapas
...was provided by section thirteen of said act and article 988 of the Penal Code that the said statutes "shall not apply to agricultural products or live...stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." And that the act of April 30, 1895, and certain sections of the Revised Statutes of Texas and of the... | |
 | 1905 - 844 lapas
...because it was provided by f 13 of said act and article 988 of the Penal Code that the said statutes "shall not apply to agricultural products or live...stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser/' And that the act of April 30, 1895, and certain sections of the Revised Statutes of Texas and of the... | |
| |
The provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products or live stock, while in the hands of the producer or raiser... 
