 | William Mark McKinney, Burdett Alberto Rich, Charles Porterfield, S. B. Fisher - 1917 - 1450 lapas
...unconstitutional, as amounting to a denial of due process of law, which declares that its provisions shall not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the possession of the producer or raiser.5 A contrary conclusion has, however, boen reached by some courts.6... | |
 | New York (State). Governor - 1919 - 368 lapas
...the United States, by reason of the fact that by the ninth section it declares that ' the provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of producer or raiser.' The Circuit Court held this section to be repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment... | |
 | 1920 - 1280 lapas
...substantially the same as the act now before us and contained one section, the ninth, readIng: "The provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products...while in the hands of the producer or raiser." The act was attacked upon the ground that this section invalidated it as a whole, and the court in so finding... | |
 | Louisiana - 1920 - 810 lapas
...APPLICABLE TO AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS, ETC. Sec. 8. Be it further enacted, etc., That the provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products...stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser; nor be so construed as to affect any combination or confederation of laborers for the purpose of procuring... | |
 | Texas. Legislature. House, Texas. Legislature. House of Representatives - 1920 - 212 lapas
...Penal Code of the State of Texas, sa as to exempt from operation of the anti-trust laws of this State agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer and making it lawful for persons engaged in work or labor to associate together and form unions or... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1921 - 1160 lapas
...431, one of the cases cited by the circuit court, is not, in our opinion, applicable. Tlip statute did not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raispr. It was held that this exemption rendered the statute void, as denying to persons within the... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1922 - 804 lapas
...was held invalid under this same clause because it contained the excepting provision that it should " not apply to agricultural products, or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." That was a stronger case than this because there the^ whole statute was one dealing with economic policy... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - 1922 - 1050 lapas
...the United States, by reason of the fact that by the ninth section it declares that ' the provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of producer or raiser.' " We can best state what the court held by quoting from its opinion as follows... | |
 | 1923 - 1634 lapas
...was held invalid under this same clause because it contained the excepting provision "that it should not apply to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." That was a stronger case than this because there the whole statute was one dealing with economic policy,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1923 - 1412 lapas
...invalid under this same clause because it contained the excepting provision "that it should not ap[>ly to agricultural products or live stock while in the hands of the producer or raiser." That was a stronger case than this because there the whole statute was one dealing with economic policy,... | |
| |
The provisions of this act shall not apply to agricultural products or live stock, while in the hands of the producer or raiser... 
