 | Johan Braeckman, Bert de Reuver, Thomas Vervisch - 2005 - 324 lapas
...skilled in the art' (art. 56). In de Amerikaanse patentwet luidt het dat geen patent kan worden verkregen 'if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | Lashon Booker, Stephanie Forrest, Melanie Mitchell, Rick Riolo - 2005 - 325 lapas
...legal criteria for obtaining a US patent are that the proposed invention be "new" and "useful" and . . .the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would [not] have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary... | |
 | James L. Rogers - 2005 - 426 lapas
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in Section 102 of this title, if the difference between the subject matter sought to be patented and...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary sill in... | |
 | Thronson, Roth, Grossman - 1403 lapas
...762, 35 USPQ2d at 1047. obvious. Section 103(a) provides in part: "A patent may not be obtained .. . if the differences between the subject matter sought...in the art to which said subject matter pertains." 128 Sample form paragraphs for the applicable legal principles section of an opinion concerning obviousness... | |
 | Stuart O. Schweitzer - 2007 - 362 lapas
...Education of the Bar 1993). By "non-obvious" the law means as follows: A patent may not be obtained . . . if the differences between the subject matter sought...in the art to which said subject matter pertains. (35 USC § 103) The determination of whether a patent is non-obvious, and therefore enforceable against... | |
 | Scott - 2007 - 2324 lapas
...of novelty, but obviousness under Section 103.215 §3.10 NONOBVIOUSNESS A patent may not be granted "if the differences between the subject matter sought...ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains...."216 To determine whether an invention is nonobvious, (g) before the applicant's invention... | |
 | Stefan Wagner - 2007 - 150 lapas
...previously been known, it will still not be patentable if "the differences between the [invention] and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | John I. Gallin, Frederick P Ognibene - 2011 - 448 lapas
...following: A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as forth in Section 102 of this title, if the differences...the art to which said subject matter pertains. The landmark Graham v. John Deere Company Supreme Court decision3 in 1966 established the following factual... | |
 | Hugh B. Wellons - 2007 - 1016 lapas
...obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 1 02 of this title, if the differences between the subject...in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made." 86. Kimberly-Clark... | |
| |
A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter... 
