 | Brian Cain - 2003 - 296 lapas
...not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in s.102 of this title, if the differences between the subject...in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. (b) (1) Notwithstanding... | |
 | John R. Koza - 2003 - 632 lapas
...obtaining a US patent are that the proposed invention be “new' “useful,” “improved,” and that “...the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would [not] have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary... | |
 | Ashish Ghosh, Shigeyoshi Tsutsui - 2002 - 1042 lapas
...for obtaining a US patent are that the proposed invention be “new” and “useful” and “... the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would [not] have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary... | |
 | M. John Sterba - 2002 - 1903 lapas
...forth in Section 102, an invention is not patentable under Section 103 if the differences between it and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | Frederick Pontius - 2003 - 1072 lapas
...USC Sec. l03. a patent may not be obtained if "the differences between the subject matter as a whole and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made. to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | Rachel Gader-Shafran - 2004 - 734 lapas
...of Matter: See Biotechnological Process, Conditions for Patentability; Non-Obvious Subject Matter. Conditions for Patentability; NonObvious Subject Matter:...in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. (b) (l)Notwithstanding... | |
 | Howard B. Rockman - 2004 - 542 lapas
...invention to the patent attorney. Obviousness As mentioned previously, the inventor cannot obtain a patent if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time of the invention to a person having ordinary skill in the... | |
 | Keith E. Maskus, Jerome H. Reichman - 2005 - 952 lapas
...patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title"); 35 USC § 103(a) (2000) ("A patent may not be obtained though the invention...the art to which said subject matter pertains."); 35 USC § 112 (2000) ("The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and... | |
 | Michael A. Epstein - 2006 - 1454 lapas
...[D] Nonobviousness Section 103 of the 1952 Patent Act precludes an inventor from obtaining a patent if the differences between the "subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains."60... | |
| |
A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter... 
