 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1963 - 954 lapas
...validity of the patent by arguing that the differences between the subject matter of the claims in issue and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious in about 1966 to a person having ordinary skill in the transponder and... | |
 | Raymond F. Clapp - 1966 - 102 lapas
...obtained, though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in Section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter... | |
 | Raymond F. Clapp - 1966 - 108 lapas
...described as set forth in ction 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be tented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole uld have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art to ich said subject matter... | |
 | Philip H. Francis - 2000 - 298 lapas
...last — non-obviousness — is the most subjective. Legally, a utility patent may not be obtained "if the differences between the subject matter sought...in the art to which said subject matter pertains." A design patent, in contrast, doesn't depend upon functionality. It can protect an invention based... | |
 | Laura F. Landweber, Erik Winfree - 2002 - 360 lapas
...legal criteria for obtaining a US patent are that the proposed invention be "new" and "useful" and the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would [not] have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary... | |
 | Peter S. Canelias - 2001 - 736 lapas
...be applied by you in considering the validity of each of the patents herein issue is to determine if "the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | Lanning G. Bryer, Melvin Simensky - 2002 - 456 lapas
...person of ordinary skill in the art when the invention was made.41 A patent is invalid for obviousness if: the differences between the subject matter sought...ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.42 The ultimate question of obviousness is a question of law.43 Despite this fact, factual... | |
 | Michael A. Epstein, Frank L. Politano - 2002 - 1044 lapas
...[4] Nonobviousness Section l03 of the l952 Patent Act precludes an inventor from obtaining a patent if the differences between the "subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains."l70... | |
 | Peter Toren - 2003 - 916 lapas
...that all of the elements of a claim be found in a single prior art reference. 8 See 35 USC § 103(a): "A patent may not be obtained though the invention...in the art to which said subject matter pertains." 9 The Supreme Court in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 US 1, 17, 86 S.Ct. 684, 15 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966)... | |
| |
A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter... 
