 Comity,' in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. But it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial...  Handbook of Information Security, Information Warfare, Social, Legal, and ... - 323. lappuseautors: Hossein Bidgoli - 2006 - 1008 lapasIerobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu
 | Sarah Joseph - 2004 - 190 lapas
...rights litigation. Comity The doctrine of international comity has been defined as 'the recognition one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of another nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience'.200 Comity essentially applies where... | |
 | Anne-Marie Slaughter - 2009 - 368 lapas
...the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will on the other . . . comity is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive, or judicial acts of another nation."" "Recognition" is essentially a passive affair, signaling deference to another nation's action. Positive... | |
 | Oren Perez - 2004 - 308 lapas
...Rosencranz and Campbell (1999). 752 Under US law the doctrine of comity refers to "the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of another nation". Pravin Banker Associates, Lt. v Banco Popular del Peru, 109 F 3d 850, 854 (2d Cir 1997). The doctrine... | |
 | David J. Levy - 2003 - 412 lapas
...one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will upon the other."5 Rather, "it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive, or judicial acts of another nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens... | |
 | American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law - 2004 - 898 lapas
...concept of respect among coequal sovereign nations and plays a role in determining "the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of another nation."7 Thus, in determining whether to assert jurisdiction to investigate or bring an action, or... | |
 | 2005 - 372 lapas
...comity require a different result.69 The US Supreme Court has defined comity as "the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive, or judicial acts of another nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens,... | |
 | Sabine Kofmel Ehrenzeller - 2005 - 652 lapas
...on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. But it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive, or judicial acts of another nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens... | |
 | Jan Krause - 2005 - 286 lapas
...on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. But it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts ofanother nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience, and to the rights ofits... | |
 | Ilka Klöckner - 2006 - 280 lapas
...on the one hand nor of mere courtesy and good will upon the other. But it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of another nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens... | |
 | Robert E. Lutz - 2006 - 507 lapas
...absolute obligation . . . nor of mere courtesy and good will. . . . But it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of another nation, having due regard hoth to international duty and convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens... | |
| |
