 Comity,' in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. But it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial...  Handbook of Information Security, Information Warfare, Social, Legal, and ... - 323. lappuseautors: Hossein Bidgoli - 2006 - 1008 lapasIerobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu
 | Westel Woodbury Willoughby - 1924 - 530 lapas
...Court of the United States, defining "comity" in a legal sense, says that it is "the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of another nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens... | |
 | Ernest Gustav Lorenzen - 1924 - 1136 lapas
...mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. But it is the recognition which one nation allows %ithin its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of another nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens... | |
 | 1924 - 1056 lapas
...on the other, and where a comity is extended to the laws of another sovereignty it is a recognition one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive, or judicial acts of another nation, and every nation must be the final judge for itself of the nature and extent of its duties on the occasions... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1926 - 1182 lapas
...persuades, but does not command, and its obligation is not imperative. It is the recognition which one state allows within its territory to the legislative, executive, or judicial acts of another state, having due regard both to international duty and convenience and to the rights of its own citizens... | |
 | Amos Shartle Hershey - 1927 - 820 lapas
...past has generally been Machiavellian 9 instead of Grotian.10 While 7 Comity is the "recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive, or judicial acts of another nation." Justice Gray, in Hilton v. Guyot (1894), 159 US Rep. 113, 164. But this definition is too narrow. For... | |
 | Canal Zone. Supreme Court - 1927 - 664 lapas
...al, v. 5. 5. " Urubamba," 404. 4. Comity defined. Comity between nations is the recognition which one allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of the other, having due regard to internationl duty and convenience and to the rights of its own citizens... | |
 | John Donaldson - 1928 - 718 lapas
...on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will upon the other. But it is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive, or judicial acts of another nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens... | |
 | State Bar Association of Wisconsin - 1906 - 540 lapas
...obligation on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will on the other. It is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of another, having due regard both to international duty and convenience and to the rights of its own citizens... | |
 | Hersch Lauterpacht - 1957 - 788 lapas
...vs. Guyot (supra), the highest court of the United States said that comity ' is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive, or judicial acts of another nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens... | |
| |
