[ Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots. ]

[ Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots. ]

...spoke just as vigorously to the process of Constitutional construction itself, decrying those who would "contend for that narrow construction which, in support...government those powers which the words of the grant . . . import."7 Substantively, Marshall's opinion spoke to the necessity, responded to by the Congress...

[ Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots. ]

...and rejects another meaning of strict construction — that of limiting equitable interpretation. If they contend for that narrow construction which, in...with the general views and objects of the instrument. . . . then we cannot perceive the propriety of this strict construction, nor adopt it as the rule by...

...import, we might question the application of the term, but should not controvert the principle. If they contend for that narrow construction which, in...cripple the government, and render it unequal to the object for which it is declared to be instituted, and to which the powers given, as fairly understood,...

...construction of them? Indeed, he continued, "what do gentlemen mean, by a strict construction?" "If they contend for that narrow construction which, in...consistent with the general views and objects of the instrument—for that narrow construction, which would cripple the government, and render it unequal...

...the other hand, Marshall continued, if Ogden's lawyers were asking for a "narrow construction" that would "deny to the government those powers which the words of the [Constitution] import" or "cripple the government," then "we cannot perceive the propriety of this...

[ Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots. ]

[ Atvainojiet, šīs lappuses saturs ir ierobežots. ]