 The doctrine of the separation of powers was adopted by the Convention of 1787, not to promote efficiency but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. The purpose was, not to avoid friction, but, by means of the inevitable friction incident to the...  Hearings - 988. lappuseautors: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce - 1970Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs - 1982 - 860 lapas
...Convention of 1787, not to promote efficiency but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. The purpose was, not to avoid friction, but, by means of the Inevitable friction Incident to the distribution of the governmental powers among three departments, to save the people from autocracy." Myers v. United... | |
 | 1984 - 1220 lapas
...Convention of 1787, not to promote efficiency but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. The purpose was, not to avoid friction, but, by means of the inevitable friction incident to the distribution of governmental powers among three departments, to save the people from autocracy.189 ">« 424 US at 118-43,... | |
 | Rabin - 1984 - 342 lapas
...Convention of 1787, not to promote efficiency but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. The purpose was, not to avoid friction, but by means of the inevitable friction incident to the distribution of governmental powers among three departments, to save the people from autocracy (Myers v. US, 1926:... | |
 | E. Lauterpacht, C. J. Greenwood - 1987 - 812 lapas
...Convention of 1787, not to promote efficiency but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. The purpose was, not to avoid friction, but, by means of the inevitable friction incident to the distribution of the governmental powers among three departments, to save the people from autocracy." Myers v. United... | |
 | E. Lauterpacht - 1986 - 806 lapas
...Convention of 1787, not to promote efficiency but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. The purpose was, not to avoid friction, but, by means of the inevitable friction incident to the distribution of the governmental powers among three departments, io save the people from autocracy." Myen v. Uniteti... | |
 | Simeon Willis - 1988 - 436 lapas
...powers was not to promote efficiency, but to preclude the exercise of arbitrary power. The purpose was not to avoid friction, but, by means of the inevitable friction incident to the distribution of the governmental powers among three departments, to save the people from autocracy. The purse was placed... | |
| |
