...prohibits only unreasonable restraints, certain practices are unreasonable per se — that is, they "are conclusively presumed to be unreasonable and...without elaborate inquiry as to the precise harm they have caused or the business excuse for their use." See Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States,...

...prohibits only unreasonable restraints, certain practices are unreasonable per se — that is, they "are conclusively presumed to be unreasonable and...without elaborate inquiry as to the precise harm they have caused or the business excuse for their use." See Northern Pacific Bail way Co. r. United States,...

...economic policy as reflected in the antitrust laws. Such arrangements are illegal in and of themselves because of their "pernicious effect on competition and lack of any redeeming virtue." Northern Pac. Ry. v. United States, 356 US 1 (1958). 77 be entirely eliminated through each step of...

...economic policy as reflected in the antitrust laws. Such arrangements are illegal In and of themselves because of their "pernicious effect on competition and lack of any redeeming virtue." Northern Pac. Ry. v. United States, 356 US 1 (1958). Through marketing agreements which this bill would...

...have been considered by the Supreme Court to be — That category of antitrust violations made up of agreements or practices which, because of their pernicious...any redeeming virtue, are conclusively presumed to he unreasonable without elaborate inquiry as to the precise harm they have caused or the business excuse...

...contracts or combinations which because of their "pernicious effect on competition and lack of an y redeeming virtue are conclusively presumed to be unreasonable...without elaborate inquiry as to the precise harm they have caused or the business excuse for their use." 3« In its interpretation of the Sherman Act, the...

...prohibits only unreasonable restraints, certain practices are unreasonable per se — that is, they "are conclusively presumed to be unreasonable and...without elaborate inquiry as to the precise harm they have caused or the business excuse for their use." See Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States,...

...of the rule of prr xe illegality, is applied in the case of certain restrictions, which liecaii.se of "their pernicious effect on competition and lack...any redeeming virtue are conclusively presumed to IH> unreasonable and therefore illegal without elaborate inquiry as to the precise harm they have caused...

...factual issues, there is a category of anti-trust offenses which are properly resolved without trial. There are "certain agreements or practices which because...without elaborate inquiry as to the precise harm they have caused or the business excuse for their use. This principle of per se unreasonableness not only...

...Monopolies § 16 — per se unreasonableness 4. The principle of per se unreasonableness, under which certain agreements or practices which, because of...presumed to be unreasonable and therefore illegal under the Sherman Act (15 USC 55 1-7) without elaborate inquiry as to the precise harm they have caused...