 A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter...  Court of Customs and Patent Appeals Reports - 901. lappuseautors: United States. Court of Customs and Patent Appeals - 1963Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu
 | M. John Sterba - 2002 - 1903 lapas
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in Section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | Peter Toren - 2003 - 916 lapas
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | Frederick Pontius - 2003 - 1072 lapas
...USC Sec. l03. a patent may not be obtained if "the differences between the subject matter as a whole and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made. to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | Rachel Gader-Shafran - 2004 - 734 lapas
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | Keith E. Maskus, Jerome H. Reichman - 2005 - 952 lapas
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | Michael A. Epstein - 2006 - 1454 lapas
...Nonobviousness Section 103 of the 1952 Patent Act precludes an inventor from obtaining a patent if the differences between the "subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains."60... | |
 | Lashon Booker, Stephanie Forrest, Melanie Mitchell, Rick Riolo - 2005 - 325 lapas
...legal criteria for obtaining a US patent are that the proposed invention be "new" and "useful" and . . .the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would [not] have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary... | |
 | Johan Braeckman, Bert de Reuver, Thomas Vervisch - 2005 - 324 lapas
...the art' (art. 56). In de Amerikaanse patentwet luidt het dat geen patent kan worden verkregen 'if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
 | James L. Rogers - 2005 - 426 lapas
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in Section 102 of this title, if the difference between the subject matter sought to be patented and...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary sill in... | |
| |
