...arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; 86-482 O— 95 12 (B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege,...(D) without observance of procedure required by law; (E) unsupported by substantial evidence in a case subject to sections 556 and 557 of this title or...

...action, findings, and conclusions found to be— (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (B) contrary...(D) without observance of procedure required by law; (El unsupported by substantial evidence in a case reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided...

...be — (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; i B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege,...(D) without observance of procedure required by law; (E) unsupported by substantial evidence in a case reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided...

...to be A arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; В contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege,...D without observance of procedure required by law; E unsupported by substantial evidence. . . . F unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts...

...The APA, section 706(2)(C), already requires reviewing courts to set aside agency action found to be "in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right." Thus, section 627(a) seems unnecessary, and the new language will likely lead to confusion. Similarly,...

...law" ist, (2) (A), also eher den Common Law-Maßstäben Genüge getan wurde, als auch ob die Maßnahme „in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right" ist, (2) (C). Ähnlich ambivalent ist die Unterscheidung von „rulemaking" und „adjudication", 5...

...otherwise not in accordance with law; contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; or without observance of procedure required by law. (5) If proceedings have been instituted under this...

...or the Chairman < Board found to be — (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or < wise not in accordance with law; (B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, < immunity; (C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or I tations, or in violation of a...

...to be — (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law (B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege...right; (D) without observance of procedure required by the law; J (I) unsupported by substantial evidence in a cue subject to sections 556 and 5S7 of this...

...set aside a designation the court finds to be— "(A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; "(B) contrary...constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; or "(4) JUDICIAL REVIEW INVOKED.—The pendency of an action for judicial review of a designation shall...