 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1953 - 190 lapas
... : ..... ' ' '" "!i» 'i*' '< «i' «»i!«<in>' right, power, privilege, or immunity; (3) In excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (4) without observance of procedure required by law; (5) unsupported by substantial evidence In any... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency - 1957 - 896 lapas
...not in accordance with law; (2^ contrary to constitutional rightj power, privilege, or immunity; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (4) without observance of procedure required by law; and (5) unsupported by substantial evidence. We... | |
 | United States. Congress. Joint Committee on Atomic Energy - 1971 - 676 lapas
...be (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not In accordance with law ; (C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right. . . . In this case plaintiffs assert and defendants do not seem to contest the fact that the Atomic... | |
 | United States - 1958 - 668 lapas
...not in accordance with law; (2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right ; (4) without observance of procedure required by law; (5) unsupported by substantial evidence in any... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1959 - 822 lapas
...not in accordance with law; (2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (3) In excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (4) without observance of procedure required by law; (5) unsupported by substantial evidence In any... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1960 - 988 lapas
...not in accordance with law; (2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (4) without observance of procedure required by law; (5) unsupported by substantial evidence in any... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Government Operations - 1961 - 212 lapas
...in accordance with law ; (2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity ; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (4) without observance of procedure required by law; (5) unsupported by substantial evidence in any... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Government Operations - 1961 - 468 lapas
...in accordance with law ; (2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity ; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (4) without observance of procedure required by law; (5) unsupported by substantial evidence in any... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking and Currency - 1961 - 76 lapas
...not in accordance with law; (2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (4) without observance of procedure required by law; (5) unsupported by substantial evidence in any... | |
 | United States - 1963 - 340 lapas
...action, findings, and conclusions found to be (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (B) contrary...(D) without observance of procedure required by law; (E) unsupported by substantial evidence in a case subject to sections 556 and 557 of this title or... | |
| |
The reviewing court shall: 1 . compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed; and 2. hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be: a) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not... 
