 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs - 1950 - 1402 lapas
...foreign commerce is to be governed, that — The Congress manifestly is "not permitted to abdicate or transfer to others" the essential legislative functions with which it is thus vested. Now, the same discussion of the delegated authority in the National Industrial Recovery Act, the NIRA,... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs - 1950 - 832 lapas
...foreign commerce is to be governed, that — The Congress manifestly is "not permitted to abdicate or transfer to others" the essential legislative functions with which it is thus vested. Now, the same discussion of the delegated authority in the National Industrial Recovery Act, the NIRA,... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Finance - 1951 - 1464 lapas
...but they cannot create or change constitutional power. Congress is not permitted by the Constitution to abdicate or to transfer to others the essential legislative functions with which it is vested. Congress may leave to selected instrumentalities the making of subordinate rules within prescribed... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1953 - 216 lapas
...delegation of legislative power Is equally untenable. This is not a case where Congress has attempted to abdicate, or to transfer to others, the essential legislative functions with which it is vested by the Constitution. And he refers to Panama Kenning Company versus Ryan, which is one of the... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1953 - 218 lapas
...delegation of legislative power is equally untenable. This is not a case where Congress has attempted to abdicate, or to transfer to others, the essential legislative functions with which it is vested by the Constitution. And he refers to Panama Refining Company versus Ryan, which is one of the... | |
 | United States. Department of State - 1956 - 1474 lapas
...exclusive power of Congress to regulate commerce under the Constitution, stated: "The Congress manifestly is not permitted to abdicate or to transfer to others...legislative functions with which it is thus vested." This principle is definitely applicable to GATT in spite of the dictum of Mr. Justice Sunderland in... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1957 - 908 lapas
...code-making authority was held to be an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power. Id., at 542. "The Congress is not permitted to abdicate or to transfer...the essential legislative functions with which it is ... vested." Id., at 529. The vice in the Schechter case was not that the President was the one who... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - 1960 - 1732 lapas
...44, 45; NLRB v. Padin Co. (1947), 101 F. 2d 353; Ruscar/lia v. Rallester (1947), 162 F. 2d 805, 807.) The Congress is not permitted to abdicate or to transfer...the essential legislative functions with which It is vested. It may delegate to local legislative bodies broad jurisdiction over territories and ceded areas... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce - 1964 - 726 lapas
...competent to grant. The Constitution provides that all legislative powrers be vested in the Congress. Congress is not permitted to abdicate or to transfer...legislative functions with which it is thus vested (Schechter Corporation v. United States. 295 US 495 (1935)>. In addition, S. 774 would deprive purchasers... | |
| |
The Congress is not permitted to abdicate or to transfer to others the essential legislative functions with which it is thus vested. 
