...in value judgments as to the worth of artistic works. As stated by none other than Justice Holmes: "It would be a dangerous undertaking for persons trained...constitute themselves final judges of the worth of [artistic works]. "63 Furthermore, the judicial trend from the "more than merely trivial variation"...

...discriminate in its Laws against designs merely because they are industrially applied. The Court said: It would be a dangerous undertaking for persons trained...final judges of the worth of pictorial illustrations ... At the one extreme some works of genius would be sure to miss appreciation. Their very novelty...

...discriminate m its laws against ¿•«'g"« merely because they an industrially applied. The Court said: It would be a dangerous undertaking for persons trained only to the law to constitute themselves Urtai judges of the worth of pictorial illustrations ... At the one extreme some works of genius would...

...be made available on videocassette.24/ As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes stated almost a century ago: It would be a dangerous undertaking for persons trained...outside of the narrowest and most obvious limits.... Yet if they [pictorial illustrations] command the interest of any public, they have a commercial value.......

...making an irresistible occasion for displaying personal taste. It would be dangerous, Holmes warned, for "persons trained only to the law to constitute...final judges of the worth of pictorial illustrations." The "taste of any public is not to be treated with contempt."20 So rich and powerful a decision had...

...not be pressed into that service: "It would be a dangerous undertaking for persons trained only in the law to constitute themselves final judges of the worth of pictorial illustrations .... At the one extreme some works of genius would be sure to miss appreciation. Their very novelty...

...Lithographing Co. .38 which concluded that it was not for judges to engage in "aesthetic evaluations": It would be a dangerous undertaking for persons trained...outside of the narrowest and most obvious limits. Yet it is inevitable — and foreign experience confirms this conclusion -- that enforcement of moral...

...Court decision on copyright: namely, that artistic merit should not be a factor in granting copyright. 'It would be a dangerous undertaking for persons trained...final judges of the worth of pictorial illustrations.* wrote Justice Holmes in the 1903 Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithography Co. decision.36 1 Reicruun, 'Copyright...

...not comfortable defining art. One recalls Justice Holmes' stern warning at the turn of the century: "It would be a dangerous undertaking for persons trained...themselves final judges of the worth of pictorial illustrations."4 Moreover, the very nature and concept of art is changing rapidly — with credit (or...

...injunction should be issued). 29 See, eg, Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co., 188 US 239, 251 (1903) ("It would be a dangerous undertaking for persons...final judges of the worth of pictorial illustrations . . . ."). determined definitions of art, they are more comfortable with eligibility standards based...