 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 1072 lapas
...invention — what is not. 1. It la not a new Invention to use an old machine for a new purpose. 2. A mere carrying: forward, or new or more extended application of the original thoughts change only in form, proportions or degree, doing substantially the same thing In the same... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1886 - 614 lapas
...Wall., 112) that— a mere carrying forward a new or more extended application of the original thonght, a change only in form, proportions, or degree, the...results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent. So in Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Truck Company (110 US, 490), Mr. Jnstice Gray, delivering... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1886 - 1020 lapas
...in Smith v. Nichols, 21 Wall., 112 [88 U. 8., bk. 22, L. ed., 556], that " a mere carrying forward a new or more extended application of the original thought,...doing substantially the same thing in the same way bv substantially the same means, with better results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent."... | |
 | United States. Circuit Court (2nd Circuit) - 1888 - 634 lapas
...than that of the Supreme Court in Smith v. Nichols, (21 Wall., 112, 119:) "A mere carrying forward of new or more extended application of the original thought,...results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent. There should be a decree dismissing the bill. Henry Brodhead, for the plaintiffs. Preston Stevenson,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1889 - 648 lapas
...the improver, and the latter cannot use the original invention without the consent of the former. But a mere carrying forward or new or more extended application...in form, proportions or degree, the substitution of equiva81 Wall. 118-119. Notes and Citations. lents, doing substantially the same thing in the same... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1890 - 718 lapas
...353 [9 Am. & Eng. 340.1 In Smith r. Nichols, 21 Wall. 112 [9 Am. & Eng. 425,] it was held that ' ' A mere carrying forward or new or more extended application...results. is not such invention as will sustain a patent." The case of Reckendorfer v. Faber, 92 US 347 [10 Am. Opinion of the court. & Eng. 373,] is much in... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1890 - 696 lapas
...mere carrying forward, anew or more extended application of the 114 US 153-154. Opinion of the court. original thought, a change only in form, proportions,...results, is not such invention as will sustain a patent." So in Penn. RR Co. v. Locomotive Track Co., 110 US 490 [15 Am. & Eng. 148,] Mr. Justice Gray, delivering... | |
 | Lorenzo Smith Boswell Sawyer, United States. Circuit Court (9th Circuit) - 1890 - 704 lapas
...better work than any of the others, but that is not sufficient; the established doctrine being that "a change only in form, proportions, or degree, the...such invention as will sustain a patent," (Smith v. Nieliols, 21 Wall. 119.) The bill must be dismissed, with costs to defendant, and it is so ordered.... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1890 - 784 lapas
...display of the expected skill of the calling. Says the court in Smith v. Meholx, (21 Wall., 112:) But a mere carrying forward or new or more extended application...form, proportions, or degree, the substitution of equivalent!*, doing substantially the game thing in the same way l>y substantially the name means with... | |
| |
But a mere carrying forward or new or more extended application of the original thought, a change only in form, proportions or degree, the substitution of equivalents, doing substantially the same thing in the same way by substantially the same means... 
