The high seas being open to all nations, no State may validly purport to subject any part of them to its sovereignty. Hearings - 96. lappuseautors: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs - 1969Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu
| United States. Congress. House. Merchant Marine and Fisheries - 1967 - 110 lapas
...High Seas — Law of the Sea Convention, No. II, April 29, 1958 — states as follows: The high seaa being open to all nations, no State may validly purport...the conditions laid down by these articles and by other rules of international law. It compromises, inter alia, both for coastal and non-coastal States... | |
| J. H. W. Verzijl - 1971 - 336 lapas
...it is to my mind a bad example of codification and drafting. It rightly begins by laying down that "the high seas being open to all nations, no State...purport to subject any part of them to its sovereignty", but it then goes astray, from the point of view of good drafting. Instead of attempting to explain... | |
| George T. Hacket - 1994 - 280 lapas
...on the High Seas, done at Geneva, April 29, 1958, 13 UST 2312, 450 UNTS 82. Article 2 provides for: "The High Seas being open to all nations, no State may validly puport to subject any part of them to its sovereignty, Freedom of the high seas is excercised under... | |
| Jean-Pierre Lévy, Gunnar G. Schram - 1996 - 856 lapas
...Freedom of the high seas 1 . The high seas are open to all States, whether coastal or land-locked. Freedom of the high seas is exercised under the conditions laid down by this Convention and by other rules of international law. It comprises, inter alia, both for coastal... | |
| Vladimir Đuro Degan - 1997 - 592 lapas
...final results often remain uncertain. There are trends therefore for H Its Article 2(1) says that: "The high seas being open to all nations, no State...to subject any part of them to its sovereignty..." There is litde difference between sovereignty and appropriation for exclusive exploitation of parts... | |
| |