...72 Stat. 731; 49 USC 13Gj. 44/ When faced with a problem of statutory construction, the courts show "great deference to the interpretation given the statute by the officers or agency charged with it* administration." Udall v. Tallman, 380 US 1, at 16 (1964). See also, Philadelphia Television Broadcasting...

...agency dministering the statute must determine it initially.' To sustain the commission's pplication of this statutory term, we need not find that its construction is the only easonable one, or even that it is the result we would have reached had the question risen in the first...

...interpretation.—' 2/ See, Udall v. Tallman, 380 US 1. (1965), in which the Supreme Court stated: "When faced with a problem of statutory construction,...officers or agency charged with its administration. Id. at 16. 3/ Levin, "Judicial Review and the Bumpers Amendment" (Nov. 1979) p. 18. 4/ Ddall v. Tallman,...

...Congress intended for these regulations." Du Pont, 430 US, at 138. iv It is by now a commonplace that "when faced with a problem of statutory construction,...officers or agency charged with its administration." Udall v. Tollman, 380 US 1, 16 (1965)." The statute itself does not provide *• Respondents contend...

...the court says something? Mr. CARLEY. Reading the Court's decision, the Highest Court in the land, "When faced with a problem of statutory construction,...deference to the interpretation given the statute by the offices or agencies charged with its administration." OMB is that agency charged with the administration...

...example, and that was the Environmental Protection Agency v. National Crushed Stone; the court said: When faced with a problem of statutory construction,...deference to the interpretation given the statute by the officer or agency charged with its administration. In my view, this is not the way Congress intended...

...example, and that was the Environmental Protection Agency v. National Crushed Stone; the court said: When faced with a problem of statutory construction,...deference to the interpretation given the statute by the officer or agency charged with its administration. In my view, this is not the way Congress intended...

...the court says something? Mr. CARLEY. Reading the Court's decision, the Highest Court in the land, "When faced with a problem of statutory construction,...deference to the interpretation given the statute by the offices or agencies charged with its administration." OMB is that agency charged with the administration...

...preempt the Hawaii Act. Opinion Letter 75-22, [1976] Pens.Plan Guide (CCH) 1125,136. Courts must respect "the interpretation given the statute by the officers or agency charged with its administration," particularly when the interpretation is made contemporaneously with the enactment of the statute. Udall...

...Protection Agency v. National Crushed Stone Association, decided in 1981, the court had this to say: "When faced with a problem of statutory construction,...officers or agency charged with its administration." In my view, this is not the way Congress intended the system to work. The court, not the agency itself,...