..."Except as otherwise provided by statute, the proponent of a rule or order has the burden of proof. Aiiy oral or documentary evidence may be received, but...provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or antiuiy repetitious evidence. A sanction may not be imposed or rule or order issued except on consideration...

...a rule or order has thi burden of proof. Any oral or documentary evidence may be received, but tbc agency as a matter of policy shall provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial or anduly repetitious evidence. A sanction may not be imposed or rule or crder issued except on consideration...

...did not conduct. Section 7(d) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 USC § 556(d)) provides in part: Any oral or documentary evidence may be received but...irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. Reports of tests performed under the supervision of a testifying expert are admissible in administrative...

...Except as otherwise provided by statute, the proponent of a rule or order has the burden of proof. Any oral or documentary evidence may be received,...irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. A sanction may not be imposed or rule or order issued except on consideration of the whole record or...

...Except as otherwise provided by statute, the proponent of a rule or order has the burden of proof. Any oral or documentary evidence may be received,...irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. A sanction may not be imposed or rule or order issued except on consideration of the whole record or...

...Except as otherwise provided by statute, the proponent of a rule or order has the burden of proof. Any oral or documentary evidence may be received,...irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. A sanction may not be imposed or rule or order issued except on consideration of the whole record or...

...Except as otherwise provided by statute, the proponent of a rule or order has the burden of proof. Any oral or documentary evidence may be received,...irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. A sanction may not lie imposed or rule or order issued except on consideration of the whole record...

...1983) (rules of evidence not applicable); Everly v. Chicago Police Bd., 1 19 111. App. 3d 631, 456 oral or documentary evidence may be received, but...exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence."313 Noticeably omitted is any prohibition against the use of hearsay evidence. Courts no...

...to reverse the presumption was based on expedience. 26. For the federal system, see 5 USC § 556(d) ("Any oral or documentary evidence may be received, but the agency as a matter of policy shail provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial or unduly repetitious evidence."). See Pierce,...

...presiding over a hearing may "receive relevant evidence." Second, Section 556(d) provides that an agency "shall provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence." Finally, Section 556(d) also requires that agency TRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT 271 (1946) (House Judiciary...