 No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title...  Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan - 324. lappuseautors: Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, James M. Reasoner, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, Richard W. Cooper - 1916Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu
 | Virginia. General Assembly - 1887 - 108 lapas
...instructor, and to make for his support such private contract as he shall please. SEC. 15. No laws shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title, nor shall any law be revived or amended with reference to its title, but the act revived, or the section... | |
 | 1888 - 1020 lapas
...mortgaged goods and chattels, is in direct violation of Const. Mich. art. 4, § 20, which requires that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be embraced in its title, " as the sections referred to in the title of the act make no reference to chattel... | |
 | 1889 - 954 lapas
...act as a judge of the chancery court, is not repugnant to Const. Va. art. 5, 8 15, providing 'jhat "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its «tie." Appeal from chancery court of city of Bichmond. Bill of review filed by Chapman W. Morriss.... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1889 - 738 lapas
...§ 2, is in violation of article 4, section 16 of the constitution, which is in these words : " Xo law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title; nor shall any law be revived or amended by reference to its title ; but the act revived or amended... | |
 | 1890 - 950 lapas
...in the purposes indicated in the title to the Act amended. Section 20, art. 4. of the Constitution provides that "no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." This attempt to incorporate a new business into the Act of 1875 by the Amendment of 1881 falls plainly... | |
 | John Houston Merrill, Charles Frederic Williams, Thomas Johnson Michie, David Shephard Garland - 1890 - 1028 lapas
...companies," and being unchanged, is void as being in violation of const. Mich., art. 4, § 20, providing that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be set forth in its title. Eaton v. Walker (Mich.), 43 N. W. Rep. 638; 27 Am. & Eng. Corp. Ca>. 310. 1.... | |
 | West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1891 - 858 lapas
...March 15, 1867, is claimed to be in conflict with that provision of the constitution which declares that no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. Before the court will declare the act invalid, as opposed to the constitution, the rcpug- Au,,usst7Term.... | |
 | Michigan. Legislature. House of Representatives - 1891 - 894 lapas
...refer to the peculiar phraseology of the title. Article 4, section 20 of th6 constitution provides, "No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title." The title of the act referred to in your resolution is, "An act to re-organize the Agricultural College... | |
 | 1891 - 128 lapas
...final passage of all bills, the vote shall be by yeas and nays, and entered on the journal. SEC. 20. No law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title. No public act shall take effect or be in force until the expiration of ninety days from the end of... | |
| |
