Meklēšana Attēli Maps Play YouTube Ziņas Gmail Disks Vēl »
Ieiet
Grāmatas Grāmatas
" A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter... "
Intellectual Property Assets in Mergers and Acquisitions - 10-3. lappuse
laboja - 2002 - 456 lapas
Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu

Intellectual Property Law Dictionary

Rachel Gader-Shafran - 2004 - 734 lapas
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. (b) (l)Notwithstanding...
Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu

Intellectual Property Law for Engineers and Scientists

Howard B. Rockman - 2004 - 542 lapas
...invention to the patent attorney. Obviousness As mentioned previously, the inventor cannot obtain a patent if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time of the invention to a person having ordinary skill in the...
Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu

International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized ...

Keith E. Maskus, Jerome H. Reichman - 2005 - 952 lapas
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains."); 35 USC § 112 (2000) ("The specification shall contain a written description of the invention,...
Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu

Epstein on Intellectual Property

Michael A. Epstein - 2006 - 1454 lapas
...[D] Nonobviousness Section 103 of the 1952 Patent Act precludes an inventor from obtaining a patent if the differences between the "subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains."60...
Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu

Ethiek van DNA tot 9/11

Johan Braeckman, Bert de Reuver, Thomas Vervisch - 2005 - 324 lapas
...skilled in the art' (art. 56). In de Amerikaanse patentwet luidt het dat geen patent kan worden verkregen 'if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Perspectives on Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems

Lashon Booker, Stephanie Forrest, Melanie Mitchell, Rick Riolo - 2005 - 325 lapas
...legal criteria for obtaining a US patent are that the proposed invention be "new" and "useful" and . . .the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would [not] have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary...
Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu

Patent Act of 2005: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property - 2005 - 88 lapas
...specific proposal is unhelpfully circular. It would state, in essence, that "in determining whether the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in (he art, the subject matter shall be...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Complete Patent Kit

James L. Rogers - 2005 - 426 lapas
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in Section 102 of this title, if the difference between the subject matter sought to be patented and...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary sill in...
Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu

Translator Self-training German Patents: Practical Course in Technical ...

Morry Sofer - 2005 - 148 lapas
...prior to the application date. These criteria define the "prior art" (Stand der Technik); Non-obvious The differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art must be such that the subject matter as a whole would not have been obvious, at the time the invention...
Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu

Patent Act of 2005: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet ...

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property - 2005 - 92 lapas
...forth in section 102 of this title unless an inventive step was required to achieve the difference between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art. An inventive step shall be defined as an advance that could not have been accomplished by a person...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu




  1. Mana bibliotēka
  2. Palīdzība
  3. Izvērstā grāmatu meklēšana