| Rachel Gader-Shafran - 2004 - 734 lapas
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. (b) (l)Notwithstanding... | |
| Howard B. Rockman - 2004 - 542 lapas
...invention to the patent attorney. Obviousness As mentioned previously, the inventor cannot obtain a patent if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time of the invention to a person having ordinary skill in the... | |
| Keith E. Maskus, Jerome H. Reichman - 2005 - 952 lapas
...the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought...ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains."); 35 USC § 112 (2000) ("The specification shall contain a written description of the invention,... | |
| Michael A. Epstein - 2006 - 1454 lapas
...[D] Nonobviousness Section 103 of the 1952 Patent Act precludes an inventor from obtaining a patent if the differences between the "subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains."60... | |
| Johan Braeckman, Bert de Reuver, Thomas Vervisch - 2005 - 324 lapas
...skilled in the art' (art. 56). In de Amerikaanse patentwet luidt het dat geen patent kan worden verkregen 'if the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill... | |
| Lashon Booker, Stephanie Forrest, Melanie Mitchell, Rick Riolo - 2005 - 325 lapas
...legal criteria for obtaining a US patent are that the proposed invention be "new" and "useful" and . . .the differences between the subject matter sought...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would [not] have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary... | |
| James L. Rogers - 2005 - 426 lapas
...not identically disclosed or described as set forth in Section 102 of this title, if the difference between the subject matter sought to be patented and...the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary sill in... | |
| Morry Sofer - 2005 - 148 lapas
...prior to the application date. These criteria define the "prior art" (Stand der Technik); Non-obvious The differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art must be such that the subject matter as a whole would not have been obvious, at the time the invention... | |
| |