The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
6.–10. rezultāts no 100.
35. lappuse
... regulatory action- The CHAIRMAN . You have got to be kidding . Senator BIDEN . The regulatory action could be the FDA says you can't put it on the market . Mr. SCHMIDT . Which results in a reduction in the value of their property by a ...
... regulatory action- The CHAIRMAN . You have got to be kidding . Senator BIDEN . The regulatory action could be the FDA says you can't put it on the market . Mr. SCHMIDT . Which results in a reduction in the value of their property by a ...
36. lappuse
... regulatory action that reduces the value of somebody's property by a third or more , they are entitled to compensation . That is what the words say . Now , you can say , well , a court wouldn't reach those- The CHAIRMAN . There is a ...
... regulatory action that reduces the value of somebody's property by a third or more , they are entitled to compensation . That is what the words say . Now , you can say , well , a court wouldn't reach those- The CHAIRMAN . There is a ...
41. lappuse
... regulatory reforms to alleviate burdens on property owners , and we are developing additional ways to improve federal pro- grams to provide greater benefits to the public while reducing regulatory burdens , particularly for small ...
... regulatory reforms to alleviate burdens on property owners , and we are developing additional ways to improve federal pro- grams to provide greater benefits to the public while reducing regulatory burdens , particularly for small ...
43. lappuse
... regulation is an important consideration in deciding whether it would be fair and just to compensate a property owner . But in the very case that established the concept of a regulatory taking- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v . Mahon ( 1922 ) ...
... regulation is an important consideration in deciding whether it would be fair and just to compensate a property owner . But in the very case that established the concept of a regulatory taking- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v . Mahon ( 1922 ) ...
46. lappuse
... regulatory nightmare where the government is forbidding them from using their property in the way that they want . It is important to look closely at these stories , for they often are not as they first appear . They sometimes contain a ...
... regulatory nightmare where the government is forbidding them from using their property in the way that they want . It is important to look closely at these stories , for they often are not as they first appear . They sometimes contain a ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER Administration agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law Congress Constitution contract costs County Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government action government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation restrictions result safety SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS