Lapas attēli

Money Laundering

The more sophisticated drug trafficking organizations

have laundered money for years.

In some cases, they

purchase service-oriented businesses which are losing money and then deposit their drug money in the bank under the

guise of legitimate business profits. They sometimes


smuggle enormous amounts of currency out of the country for deposit in foreign banks.

Then, to get their money back to the United States

where they can use it, traffickers might set up a phony

corporation in still another country. This offshore shell corporation draws on the funds deposited in the first country and wire transfers them to the traffickers' U.S.

bank accounts, with the transactions disguised as legitimate


Or, using the simplest approach of all, traffickers

can bribe a dishonest bank employee to let them deposit unlimited cash without any CTR's being filed.

To give you just a few examples of how successful these

enterprises can be, consider money launderer Eduardo Orozco,

who was convicted, along with half a dozen others, in May

1983 on drug conspiracy charges.

Over a four-year period,

Orozco deposited $150 million in cash in some

18 bank and

currency exchange accounts, mostly in New York City.


then transferred these funds to other accounts in the 0.s.,

Panama, the Bahamas and the Cayman Islands.

Orozco was a

well-educated, sophisticated, highly intelligent

professional, with all the trappings of a legitimate


In a 1983 Miami conspiracy case, DEA arrested 36


two of whom were bank officials--a vice

president of the Great American Bank and a vice president of the Bank of Miami. The defendants had negotiated with

undercover DEA agents to recruit clients for money laundering

and investment services. Approximately $45 million in drug money had been laundered through these banks for various

cocaine traffickers.

In another case, Isaac Kattan was arrested by DEA in

February 1981.

He had on him at the time $18,000 in cash

and $365,000 in checks.

The next day search warrants were

executed and a bank account worth almost $1 million was

seized, along with an international telex machine, several

money counting machines, and thousands of financial documents.

Analysis of the seized documents showed that Rattan's

organization had handled gross proceeds estimated at $200-$250 million per year. During the four-month period prior to

Rattan's arrest, his two money couriers transported $61

million in cash to a brokerage firm.

This money was the

proceeds from cocaine sales in New York, Los Angeles, and

Miami and movement of the funds was facilitated by Rattan's

travel agency in Cali, Colombia, which was also licensed

to conduct business as a money exchange.

These examples are dated for obvious reasons.


are certainly many more among our still-open investigations.

Our agents, acting undercover, are being approached on

a routine basis by traffickers who are looking to launder


sums of money.

Traffickers have claimed to have as

much as $200 million to launder and we

can easily suspect

that if they have $200 million to place with one money

launderer, there is even more being handled by others.

Rarely do these people put all of their eggs in one basket.

To cope with these approaches to our undercover

agents, DEA has developed techniques designed to ultimately

forfeit as much as possible of these monies to the


However, it would be inappropriate to discuss

the details of these investigative approaches in open


As DEA becomes more and more proficient at locating and

seizing drug trafficker assets and seeing these assets

forfeited to the government, two things are likely to


Pirst, traffickers will go to greater lengths to

move their prof its out of the country; and second, they will develop more and more complex schemes to launder their

money Our investigative techniques and our laws must stay one step ahead if we are to have any truly meaningful impact

on the availability of drugs in this country.

Mr. Chairman, I appreciate this Subcommittee's interest in the role of money laundering in drug trafficking. I will

be pleased to answer any questions you may have.

Thank you.

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

On April 23, 1986, the Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervisior., Regulation and Insurance will continue its hearings on proposals to protect against financial institutions becoming havens for tax evaders, drug traffickers and launderers of funds derived from criminal activity.

As the lead Federal agency in enforcing narcotics and controlled substances laws and regulations and whose primary responsibilities include investigation of major narcotics violators (interstate and international), your testimony would be extremely helpful to the Subcommittee in its efforts to better understand the devastating effects that drug trafficking and money laundering have on the economic and social fabric of this nation.

It is requested that you or your designee appear and testify before the Subcommittee on Wednesday, April 23, 1986, at 10:00 a.m., in Room 2128 Rayburn House office Building.

Please provide the Subcommittee with 175 copies of your testimony no later than 24 hours in advance of your appearance. Please have your staff contact Earl F. Rieger, Counsel of the Full Committee staff, if there are any questions.



Fernand J.St Germain

60-672 0 - 86 - 28

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »