Cases not Otherwise Reported. of Mr. Solicitor General for plaintiff in error. No. 250. ROBERTSON V. ROLFE. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. March 28, 1890: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. Assistant Attorney General Maury for plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. No. 249. ROBERTSON V. SCHNEIDER. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. March 24, 1890: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General for plaintiff in error. Mr. H. E. Tremain for defendant in error. No. 65. RoWLAND v. ATLANTIC MILLING COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. November 5, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. George H. Forster for appellant. Mr. Arthur v. Briesen for appellee. No. 263. SCHOONER COMET, HER TACKLE, ETC., ALDRICH, MASTER v. STETSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina. December 3, 1889: Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. James Lowndes on behalf of counsel. Mr. Theodore G. Barker, Mr. Henry T. Wing and Mr. Harrington Putnam for appellant. Mr. J. P. Kennedy Bryan for appellees. No. 129. SCHULTZ v. OSTRANDER. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. November 19, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. L. M. Hosea for appellant. No ap pearance for appellee. No. 280. Cases not Otherwise Reported. SENSENDERFER V. KEMP. No. 281. SAME v. SWISHER. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. April 28, 1890: Judgments affirmed, with costs. Mr. William D. Baldwin, Mr. Levin M. Campbell and Mr. Samuel P. Sparks for plaintiffs in error. Mr. George P. B. Jackson for defendants in error. No. 165. SHAW RELIEF VALVE COMPANY V. NEW BEDFORD. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. December 12, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Thomas H. Talbot and Mr. Charles H. Drew for appellant. Mr. Thomas S. Sprague and Mr. Chas. J. Hunt for appellee. No. 305. SHIRELY v. WELCH. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. May 5, 1890: Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mr. John H. Mitchell for appellant. Mr. J. N. Dolph for appellees. No. 1098. SHORDON V. REED. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Indiana. October 21, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of counsel for appellees: Mr. W. G. Howard in support of motion. Mr. Edward H. Risley opposing. No. 185. SMITH V. EXCHANGE BANK. Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Greene County, State of Pennsylvania. December 20, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. P. A. Knox for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error. No. 12. SOBRAL v. MARCHAND. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. October 15, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for appellant. Mr. J. R. Beckwith for appellant. Mr. J. D. Rouse and Mr. Wm. Grant for appellee. Cases not Otherwise Reported. Nc. 751. SOUTH AND NORTH ALABAMA RAILROAD COMPANY v. PLANTERS' AND MERCHANTS' MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama. July 18, 1889: Dismissed pursuant to the 28th rule. Mr. Thomas G. Jones for plaintiff in error. Mr. Gaylord B. Clark for defendant in error. No. 149. SOUTHERN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. HOUSTON AND TEXAS CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Texas. December 4, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. E. H. Farrar and Mr. E. B. Kruttschnitt for appellant. No appearance for appellees. No. 14. SPRINGFIELD V. THOMAS. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of TennesOctober 15, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Samuel F. Rice for plaintiffs in error. No appearance for defendant in error. see. No. 672. STEAM GAUGE LANTERN COMPANY V. ST. LOUIS RAILWAY SUPPLIES AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. November 19, 1889: Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. E. M. Marble on behalf of counsel. Mr. Edwin S. Jenney for appellant. Mr. F. N. Judson for appellee. No. 242. STONE v. LOUD. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. November 18, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. William A. McKenney of counsel for appellant. Mr. Thomas L. Wakefield and Mr. William A. McKenney for appellant. Mr. J. E. Maynadier for appellee. No. 519. THOMES v. MURRAY. Error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Montana. April 7, 1890: Dismissed for Cases not Otherwise Reported. the want of jurisdiction, and cause remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of Montana. Mr. Hiram Knowles for plaintiff in error. Mr. Walter H. Smith for defendant in error. No. 109. THORNTON v. WOOSTER. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. November 14, 1889: Dismissed per stipulation of counsel. Mr. J. C. Fraley and Mr. B. F. Lee for appellant. Mr. Frederic H. Betts for appellee. No. 687. ToWN OF ELMWOOD v. Dows. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. January 7, 1890: Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Lyman Trumbull for plaintiff in error. Mr. Lyman Trumbull and Mr. H. B. Hopkins for plaintiff in error. T. S. McClelland for defendant in error. Mr. No. 1571. TRAGER V. JENKINS. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi. April 28, 1890: Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mr. Charles J. Boatner, Mr. Van H. Manning, and Mr. Duane E. Fox for plaintiffs in error. Mr. W. Hallett Phillips for defendant in error. Appeal from the Circuit Court No. 243. TRUM v. TURNEY. of the United States for the April 2, 1890: Decree reversed, with costs; and cause remanded with directions to remand the cause to the state court. Mr. John M. Palmer, Mr. Joseph Wilby and Mr. E. W. Kittredge for appellant. Mr. II. Tompkins and Mr. R. P. Hanna for appellees. v. No. 203. TUBULAR RIVET COMPANY . COPELAND. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. January 30, 1890: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Chauncey Smith for appellant. Mr. G. M. Plympton for appellee. Cases not Otherwise Reported. No. 1499. TURNER v. SAWYER. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. November 1, 1889: Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. Fillmore Beall for appellee. January 27, 1890: Order of November 1, 1889, set aside and leave granted to redocket cause upon payment of costs. No. 94. UNITED STATES v. AGAR. Appeal from the Court of Claims. November 8, 1889: Dismissed per stipulation. Mr. Attorney General and Mr. II. J. May for appellant. Mr. S. T. Thomas for appellee. No. 1169. UNITED STATES v. IVES. Appeal from the Court of Claims. May 19, 1890: Dismissed per stipulation, on motion of Mr. George A. King for the appellee. Mr. Solicitor General for appellant. Mr. George A. King for appellee. Error to the No. 258. UNITED STATES v. KINGSBURY. Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas. March 17, 1890: Dismissed on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General for plaintiff in error. Mr. A. J. Falls for defendants in error. No. 386. UNITED STATES v. SAMUEL. Error to the Circuit. Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. March 17, 1890: Dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General for plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General for plaintiff in error. Mr. John Samuel for defendant in error. No. 1573. UNITED STATES v. TUTHILL. Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. April 21, 1890: Dismissed, on motion of Mr. Attorney General for plaintiff in error. defendant in error. No appearance for |