Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

MILLIGAN V. SAVERY.

No. 283.

Error to the Supreme

Court of the Territory of Montana. April 17, 1890: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule; and cause remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of Montana. Mr. Thomas L. Napton for plaintiffs in error. No appearance for defendant in error.

No. 1184. MILNE v. DEEN. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. January 13, 1890: Judgment affirmed, with costs and interest, by a divided court. Mr. E. C. Perkins for plaintiff in error. Mr. Esek Cowen for defendant in error.

No. 1555. MOBILE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. TENNESSEE. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee. February 3, 1890: Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. S. A. Champion for appellees.

No. 54. MAFFIT V. ARTHUR'S EXECUTORS. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. November 25, 1889: Judgment affirmed, with costs, by a divided court. Mr. Edward Hartley and Mr. Walter H. Coleman for plaintiff in error. Mr. Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Maury for defendants in error.

No. 186. MONTROSS v. BULLARD. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. January 6, 1890: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for appellants. Mr. J. W. Merriam for appellants. Mr. L. L. Coburn for appellees.

No. 221. MORRIS v. TALBOTT. Error to the Supreme Court of the Territory of Montana. March 19, 1890: Dismissed,

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

with costs; and cause remanded to the Supreme Court of the State of Montana. Mr. Hiram Knowles for plaintiff in error. Mr. W. H. Smith for defendants in error.

No. 749. MORSS v. MANCHESTER. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. June 8, 1889: Dismissed pursuant to the 28th rule. Mr. Charles II. Swan for appellant. Mr. Edwin H. Brown for appellee.

No. 117. MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY V. SALENTINE. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. November 18, 1889: Judgment reversed, costs in this court to be paid by plaintiff in error; and cause remanded with directions to remand to the state court. Mr. James G. Jenkins and Mr. F. C. Winkler for plaintiff in error., Mr. George P. Miller for defendant in

error.

No. 873. MUTUAL RESERVE FUND LIFE ASSOCIATION V. KEARY. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. April 21, 1890: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. S. S. Henkle on behalf of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. Alfred Taylor, Mr. Fred S. Parker and Mr. W. C. Jones for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendants in error.

No. 1466. NELSON V. BLANDING. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. October 21, 1889: Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. Calderon Carlisle for defendants in error.

No. 73. NEW ORLEANS WATER WORKS COMPANY v. NEW ORLEANS. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. November 5, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. Gus. A. Breaux,

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

Mr. S. P. Blanc, Mr. Thomas J. Semmes, and Mr. J. R. Beckwith for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edgar H. Farrar and Mr. B. F. Jonas for defendant in error.

No. 183. NEWPORT AND WICKFORD RAILROAD AND STEAMBOAT COMPANY v. BEATTIE. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Rhode Island. December 20, 1889: Dismissed per stipulation. Mr. Wheeler II. Peckham for plaintiff in error. Mr. Lynde Harrison for defendant in

error.

No. 291. NEWTON V. VIRGINIA. Error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. April 21, 1890: Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. William L. Royall for plaintiffs in error. Mr. R. A. Ayers for defendant in error.

No. 1556. NORTH PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY V. PENNSYLVANIA. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. May 1, 1890: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. William B. Lamberton for plaintiff in error. Mr. George R. Kaercher for plaintiff in error. No appearance entered for defendant in error.

No. 235. NUTT v. PARISH OF TENSAS. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Louisiana. March 24, 1890: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. S. Prentiss Nutt and Mr. Wade R. Young for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.

No. 320. OREGON RAILWAY AND NAVIGATION COMPANY V. ERVIN. NO. 321. SAME v. FAHNESTOCK. Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. April 30, 1890: Dismissed per stipulation. Mr. Artemas II. Holmes and Mr. John F. Dillon for appellants. Mr. Thomas II. Hubbard for appellees.

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

No. 236. OREGON RAILWAY AND NAVIGATION COMPANY V. OREGONIAN RAILWAY COMPANY. No. 237. SAME V. SAME. No. 238. SAME V. SAME. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. March 31, 1890: Judgments reversed, with costs, and causes remanded with directions to grant new trials, on authority of the decision of this court in the case between the same parties, reported in 130 U. S. 1. Mr. J. N. Dolph for plaintiff in error. Mr. George F. Edmunds and Mr. A. H. Garland for defendant in error.

No. 211. OSBORNE v. GHEEN. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. March 17, 1890: Decree affirmed with costs. Mr. W. Willoughby and Mr. S. F. Beach for appellant. Mr. A. S. Worthington for appellee.

No. 254. OTIS v. CRANE BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. March 31, 1890: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Charles K. Offield and Mr. M. B. Philipp for appellants. Mr. L. L. Bond for appellees.

No. 1108. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY V. Bowers. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. February 3, 1890: Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. John Hampton Barnes for the plaintiff in error. Mr. George Tucker Bispham for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.

No. 761. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. MAGEE. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. December 23, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. E. D. F. Brady on behalf of counsel. Mr. Wayne Mac Veagh for plaintiff in error. Mr. M. Hampton Todd for defendants in error.

Cases not Otherwise Reported.

No. 139. PICKETT v. FERGUSON. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Arkansas. November 22, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. S. P. Walker and Mr. C. W. Metcalf for plaintiff in error. Mr. D. H. Poston for defendant in error.

Error to

No. 335. PIONEER PRESS COMPANY V. MITCHELL. the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. July 29, 1889: Dismissed pursuant to the 28th rule. Mr. William D. Cornish and Mr. Gordon E. Cole for plaintiff in error. Mr. W. T. Turnbull and Mr. Charles E. Flan

drau for defendant in error.

No. 127. PRATT MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. BERRY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. November 19, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Charles H. Knox for appellant. Mr. J. W. Lee for appellees.

No. 123. RAY v. NELSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. November 18, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. L. C. Rockwell for appellants. Mr. John D. Pope for appellees.

No. 104. RICHARDS V. HAYS. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. November 13, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the 10th rule. Mr. Charles Howson for appellant. Mr. George Harding and Mr. Francis T. Chambers for appellee.

No. 59. ROBERTSON V. LUTZ. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. November 4, 1889: Dismissed, with costs, on motion

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »