John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme CourtLSU Press, 2007. gada 1. apr. - 511 lappuses John Marshall (1755--1835) was arguably the most important judicial figure in American history. As the fourth chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, serving from 1801 to1835, he helped move the Court from the fringes of power to the epicenter of constitutional government. His great opinions in cases like Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland are still part of the working discourse of constitutional law in America. Drawing on a new and definitive edition of Marshall's papers, R. Kent Newmyer combines engaging narrative with new historiographical insights in a fresh interpretation of John Marshall's life in the law. More than the summation of Marshall's legal and institutional accomplishments, Newmyer's impressive study captures the nuanced texture of the justice's reasoning, the complexity of his mature jurisprudence, and the affinities and tensions between his system of law and the transformative age in which he lived. It substantiates Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.'s view of Marshall as the most representative figure in American law. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 70.
... jurisdiction over “disputes between a State, and the citizens of another State,” he denied with assurance “that a State will be called at the bar of the Federal Court.” Five years later Marshall was summoned to appear in Chisholm v ...
... jurisdiction “in all cases arising under the Constitution and the laws of the United States,” Marshall was partly right, partly wrong, and perhaps deliberately obtuse. He was correct in reminding AntiFederalists that the power of ...
... jurisdiction, the power of the national government to establish national law through the treaty power was not. Treaty law, even if it had domestic implications, would be binding on the states and their citizens and enforceable against ...
... the relevant articles in the Constitution itself: Article 3, which gave federal courts jurisdiction over federal law, and Article 6, which made the Constitution, treaties, and federal statutes the supreme law of the land. If delegates.
... jurisdiction and the intermediate appellate court hearing appeals from the county courts, was made up of five judges. Reformers also established a separate Chancery Court, made up of three judges, reduced later to one; a Court of ...
Saturs
CHAPTER THREE | |
CHAPTER FOUR | |
CHAPTER FIVE | |
CHAPTER | |
CHAPTER SEVEN | |
EPILOGUE | |
Essay on the Sources | |
List of Cases | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2007 |
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2001 |
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2007 |