John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme CourtLSU Press, 2007. gada 1. apr. - 511 lappuses John Marshall (1755--1835) was arguably the most important judicial figure in American history. As the fourth chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, serving from 1801 to1835, he helped move the Court from the fringes of power to the epicenter of constitutional government. His great opinions in cases like Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland are still part of the working discourse of constitutional law in America. Drawing on a new and definitive edition of Marshall's papers, R. Kent Newmyer combines engaging narrative with new historiographical insights in a fresh interpretation of John Marshall's life in the law. More than the summation of Marshall's legal and institutional accomplishments, Newmyer's impressive study captures the nuanced texture of the justice's reasoning, the complexity of his mature jurisprudence, and the affinities and tensions between his system of law and the transformative age in which he lived. It substantiates Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.'s view of Marshall as the most representative figure in American law. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 88.
... Judges—United States—Biography. 3. United States. Supreme Court—Biography. I. Title. II. Series. KF8745.M3 N49 2001 347.73'2634—dc21 2001001766 ISBN-13: 978-0-8071-3249-4 (pbk. : alk. paper) Frontispiece: Portrait of John Marshall by ...
... Judge as Lockean Liberal CHAPTER FIVE Constitutional Law for a New Nation CHAPTER SIX Embattled Chief CHAPTER SEVEN Conservative Nationalist in the Age of Jackson EPILOGUE A Judge for All Seasons Essay on the Sources Index List of Cases ...
... judges against federal judges. One aspect of that struggle was economic, which I treat hereafter as part of the emergence of a national market. Marshall was also sucked into the vortex of early national politics as the Republic ...
... judges of law,” and with the justices of the peace, who “will not assent to anything which may diminish their ideal dignity & put into the hands of others a power which they will not exercise themselves.” The only thing worse than ...
... judges could and should actually govern, and the connection of this notion with judicial review, will be developed later. But it should be noted here that Marshall's experience in the 1780s laid the foundation. The defining issue was ...
Saturs
CHAPTER THREE | |
CHAPTER FOUR | |
CHAPTER FIVE | |
CHAPTER | |
CHAPTER SEVEN | |
EPILOGUE | |
Essay on the Sources | |
List of Cases | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2007 |
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2001 |
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2007 |