John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme CourtLSU Press, 2007. gada 1. apr. - 511 lappuses John Marshall (1755--1835) was arguably the most important judicial figure in American history. As the fourth chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, serving from 1801 to1835, he helped move the Court from the fringes of power to the epicenter of constitutional government. His great opinions in cases like Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland are still part of the working discourse of constitutional law in America. Drawing on a new and definitive edition of Marshall's papers, R. Kent Newmyer combines engaging narrative with new historiographical insights in a fresh interpretation of John Marshall's life in the law. More than the summation of Marshall's legal and institutional accomplishments, Newmyer's impressive study captures the nuanced texture of the justice's reasoning, the complexity of his mature jurisprudence, and the affinities and tensions between his system of law and the transformative age in which he lived. It substantiates Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.'s view of Marshall as the most representative figure in American law. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 91.
... arguments and that had as its objective the creation of a nation under law. Marshall listened to the constitutional arguments that preceded the fighting; he took part in the constitutional arguments that followed it. Strange as it may ...
... the general validity of the Fairfax proprietary grant—the point Marshall emphasized in his argument and the one that laid the legal foundation on which his own title would rest.45 Marshall had no way of knowing that Hite would be.
... argument he quickly abandoned once he made his point. It was mainly Henry who set the tone, supplied the inspirational rhetoric, and led the main assault, though Mason, as the author of the Virginia Declaration of Rights and a ...
... argument against the central government, the AntiFederalists turned for support to the radical Whig tradition of the ... arguments, Virginia Federalists, one senses, chose to not say what they really thought (but what they did express ...
... arguing that subsequent ones would be impossible. Marshall was quick to point out the flaw in logic. “If he was right, does not his own argument prove, that in his own conception, previous amendments cannot be had; for, Sir, if ...
Saturs
CHAPTER THREE | |
CHAPTER FOUR | |
CHAPTER FIVE | |
CHAPTER | |
CHAPTER SEVEN | |
EPILOGUE | |
Essay on the Sources | |
List of Cases | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2007 |
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2001 |
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2007 |