John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme CourtLSU Press, 2007. gada 1. apr. - 511 lappuses John Marshall (1755--1835) was arguably the most important judicial figure in American history. As the fourth chief justice of the United States Supreme Court, serving from 1801 to1835, he helped move the Court from the fringes of power to the epicenter of constitutional government. His great opinions in cases like Marbury v. Madison and McCulloch v. Maryland are still part of the working discourse of constitutional law in America. Drawing on a new and definitive edition of Marshall's papers, R. Kent Newmyer combines engaging narrative with new historiographical insights in a fresh interpretation of John Marshall's life in the law. More than the summation of Marshall's legal and institutional accomplishments, Newmyer's impressive study captures the nuanced texture of the justice's reasoning, the complexity of his mature jurisprudence, and the affinities and tensions between his system of law and the transformative age in which he lived. It substantiates Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.'s view of Marshall as the most representative figure in American law. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 82.
... Marbury v. Madison (1803), which leaves us to consider what he added to the idea of judicial review in that opinion that Federalist and Anti-Federalist theorists, lawyers, and judges had not already considered. His June 20 speech on the ...
... Marbury v. Madison. But what he said in that case was a distillation of lessons learned in the 1790s about the possibilities of law and the limitations of politics. As a common lawyer in Virginia, where lawyering was governing, he came ...
... Marbury v. Madison. 44 A Washington-Adams Federalist in Jeffersonian Virginia Of all the strands that make up the rich tapestry of Chief Justice Marshall's constitutional jurisprudence, none was more important than the distinction he ...
... Marbury v. Madison). What Jefferson and Madison said in the resolutions—what Marshall heard with alarm—was that the Constitution was a contract created by sovereign states and that disputes over its meaning should be settled by those ...
Esat sasniedzis šīs grāmatas aplūkošanas reižu limitu.
Saturs
CHAPTER THREE | |
CHAPTER FOUR | |
CHAPTER FIVE | |
CHAPTER | |
CHAPTER SEVEN | |
EPILOGUE | |
Essay on the Sources | |
List of Cases | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2007 |
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2001 |
John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court R. Kent Newmyer Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2007 |