 | United States. Department of Agriculture - 1993 - 640 lapas
...court must first determine "whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end of the matter; for the court, as well as the agency, must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress."... | |
 | United States. Employees' Compensation Appeals Board - 1996 - 834 lapas
...includes determining first whether "Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end of the matter; for the court, as well as the agency, must give effect to the unambigContinued In the instant case,... | |
 | Alfred C. Aman, Alfred C. Aman (Jr.) - 1992 - 236 lapas
...First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end of the matter; for the court, as well as the agency, must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress.... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - 1996 - 560 lapas
...[fjirst, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is clear, that is the end of the matter; for the court, as well as the agency, must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress.... | |
| |
When a court reviews an agency's construction of the statute which it administers, it is confronted with two questions. First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue. If the intent of Congress is... 
