United States Supreme Court Reports, 84. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1987 First series, books 1-43, includes "Notes on U.S. reports" by Walter Malins Rose. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 81.
3. lappuse
... counsel , for the statements must be viewed in context to determine if the prosecutor's conduct affected the fairness of the trial and thus thus amounts to prejudicial error ; under the " invited response " rule , the de- fense counsel's ...
... counsel , for the statements must be viewed in context to determine if the prosecutor's conduct affected the fairness of the trial and thus thus amounts to prejudicial error ; under the " invited response " rule , the de- fense counsel's ...
6. lappuse
... counsel also pointed directly at the prosecutor's table and stated : " I sub- mit to you that there's not a person in this [ 470 US 5 ] courtroom including those sitting at this table who think that Billy Young intended to defraud Apco ...
... counsel also pointed directly at the prosecutor's table and stated : " I sub- mit to you that there's not a person in this [ 470 US 5 ] courtroom including those sitting at this table who think that Billy Young intended to defraud Apco ...
11. lappuse
... counsel's going " out of bounds " in the manner of defense counsel here , or to encourage prose- cutors to respond to the " invitation . " Reviewing courts ought not to be put in the position of weighing which of two inappropriate ...
... counsel's going " out of bounds " in the manner of defense counsel here , or to encourage prose- cutors to respond to the " invitation . " Reviewing courts ought not to be put in the position of weighing which of two inappropriate ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
28 USCS 42 USCS 84 L Ed 96 S Ct action administrative agency amicus curiae Amtrak apply arbitration Brennan Circuit denied claim Clause concurring confession Cong Congress consideration or decision constitutional counsel County Court of Appeals criminal cuit denied deci defendant dissenting District Court due process ell took employee enforcement evidence FDF variances February 19 federal court filed Fourth Amendment funds Government granted hearing held Indian issue judgment judicial review jurisdiction jury Justice Powell took L Ed 2d LHWCA limited March 18 ment Miranda Miranda warnings Mississippi Sound Ohio Ops 2d Oneida opinion Peti Petition for writ Petitioner v United police preclusion Procedure proceedings prosecution prosecutor's question railroads reason respondent rule sion standards Stat statute statutory Supp supra Supreme Court tion or decision tioner Title tive trial United States 469 United States Court violation writ of certiorari