To Amend Section 2(b) of the Clayton Act: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Antitrust and Monopoly of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Eighty-sixth Congress, First SessionU.S. Government Printing Office, 1959 - 789 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 51.
6. lappuse
... Act , as amended , and the Sherman Act . The underscored portion of the provision of section 2 ( a ) quoted in the second para- graph of this letter appeared in the original Clayton Act and reflects the basic purpose of the antitrust laws ...
... Act , as amended , and the Sherman Act . The underscored portion of the provision of section 2 ( a ) quoted in the second para- graph of this letter appeared in the original Clayton Act and reflects the basic purpose of the antitrust laws ...
30. lappuse
... Sherman Act . We have indicted oil companies for that very thing . Beyond the Sherman Act , neither the Standard of Indiana nor section II ( b ) condone such conduct under the Robinson - Patman Act . A case involving this very price has ...
... Sherman Act . We have indicted oil companies for that very thing . Beyond the Sherman Act , neither the Standard of Indiana nor section II ( b ) condone such conduct under the Robinson - Patman Act . A case involving this very price has ...
31. lappuse
... Sherman Act violation at Norfolk , they haven't indicted them . They have not done anything about it that I know of . Mr. SNOW . In regard to Judge Hansen's statement that they have brought such actions , they have brought cases against ...
... Sherman Act violation at Norfolk , they haven't indicted them . They have not done anything about it that I know of . Mr. SNOW . In regard to Judge Hansen's statement that they have brought such actions , they have brought cases against ...
42. lappuse
... Act , of course , came after such practices were disclosed in Sherman Act cases , and Congress desired to reach that practice , the predatory destruction of a small competitor in the area of his operation . The FTC examiner relied upon ...
... Act , of course , came after such practices were disclosed in Sherman Act cases , and Congress desired to reach that practice , the predatory destruction of a small competitor in the area of his operation . The FTC examiner relied upon ...
96. lappuse
... Sherman Act and subject to criminal charges . So the simple truth is : S. 11 wouldn't make it merely awkward for a supply- ing company to do business with jobbers , S. 11 would make it impossible for a supplying company to do business ...
... Sherman Act and subject to criminal charges . So the simple truth is : S. 11 wouldn't make it merely awkward for a supply- ing company to do business with jobbers , S. 11 would make it impossible for a supplying company to do business ...
Saturs
3 | |
14 | |
88 | |
131 | |
150 | |
169 | |
321 | |
326 | |
617 | |
637 | |
643 | |
650 | |
657 | |
663 | |
682 | |
688 | |
338 | |
344 | |
369 | |
425 | |
485 | |
532 | |
549 | |
555 | |
556 | |
573 | |
609 | |
611 | |
696 | |
705 | |
711 | |
717 | |
722 | |
741 | |
746 | |
753 | |
771 | |
785 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
85th Congress amendment Association bill BISON branded retailers businessman buyer cents Chairman charge CHUMBRIS Clayton Act commerce compete competition or tend competitor complaint Congress consumer cost create a monopoly customers dealers decision discount discrimination in price distributors DIXON economic effect ELLIS enactment equally low price ESTES KEFAUVER fact faith defense faith to meet Federal Trade Commission freight absorption gallon gasoline gavel fell gentleman hearings independent industry injury legislation lower price major manufacturer meet competition milk National NERLINGER oil companies oil jobber Patman PENDERGRAFT percent petroleum practices predatory pricing present price differential price discrimination price war private brands proposed provision purchasers question record reduce Robinson-Patman Act section 2(b sell seller Senator HART Senator KEFAUVER Senator WILEY Sherman Act situation small business Standard Oil Standard-Detroit statement subcommittee supplier Supreme Court tend to create testimony tion U.S. Senate violation Washington wholesale
Populāri fragmenti
365. lappuse - That it shall be unlawful for any person engaged in commerce, in the course of such commerce, either directly or indirectly, to discriminate in price between different purchasers of commodities of like grade and quality...
328. lappuse - Upon proof being made, at any hearing on a complaint under this section, that there has been discrimination in price or services or facilities furnished, the burden of rebutting the prima-facie case thus made by showing justification shall be upon the person charged with a violation of this section, and unless justification shall be affirmatively shown, the commission is authorized to issue an order terminating the discrimination: Provided, however, That nothing herein contained shall prevent a seller...
469. lappuse - That nothing herein contained shall prevent discrimination in price between purchasers of commodities on account of differences in the grade, quality, or quantity of the commodity sold, or that makes only due allowance for differences in the cost of selling or transportation, or discrimination in price in the same or different communities made in good faith to meet competition...
444. lappuse - If upon such hearing the Commission shall be of the opinion that the method of competition or the act or practice in question is prohibited by this Act, it shall make a report in writing in which it shall state its findings as to the facts...
443. lappuse - And provided further, That nothing herein contained shall prevent persons engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise In commerce from selecting their own customers in bona fide transactions and not in restraint of trade...
1. lappuse - Be it enacted by the Senate and Souse of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That this Act may be cited as the "Arms Control and Disarmament Act Amendments in 1975".
348. lappuse - States ; or, to sell, or contract to sell, goods at unreasonably low prices for the purpose of destroying competition or eliminating a competitor. Any person violating any of -the provisions of this section shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
444. lappuse - ... to sell, or contract to sell, goods in any part of the United States at prices lower than those exacted by said person elsewhere in the United States for the purpose of destroying competition, or eliminating a competitor...
434. lappuse - It shall be unlawful for any packer to: (a) Engage in or use any unfair, unjustly discriminatory, or deceptive practice or device in commerce; or (b) Make or give, in commerce, any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any particular person or locality in any respect whatsoever...
437. lappuse - An Act to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints and monopolies, and for other purposes," approved October 15, 1914, as amended (USC, title 15, sec.