Risk Based Decisionmaking at the Environmental Protection Agency: Joint Hearing Before the Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources Subcommittee and Legislation and National Security Subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Third Congress, Second Session, February 1, 1994U.S. Government Printing Office, 1994 - 253 lappuses Distributed to some depository libraries in microfiche. |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action Administration agency's allocate assumptions bill Breyer Browner cancer Carol Browner Chairman chemicals Clean Clean Water Act CLINGER comparative risk analysis concerns CONGRESS THE LIBRARY CONYERS cost-benefit analysis cost-effective costs and benefits decision-making decisions develop effects environment environmental regulation environmental risks EPA's evaluation example Executive order exposure going GOLDMAN Governors Graham hazard hearing impact implement important improve industry issue Johnston amendment legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRESS look Lynn Goldman mandates MICA Mike Synar million National Office OIRA pesticide pollution President problems programs proposed public health question Reducing Risk relative risk requirements response risk assessment risk communication risk estimates risk management risk reduction risk-based safety Sally Katzen scientific scientists Senator set priorities significant specific standards statement statutes statutory Stephen Breyer Subcommittee Superfund SYNAR testimony Thank there's things THURMAN tool uncertainty
Populāri fragmenti
235. lappuse - The Honorable Mike Synar Chairman, Subcommittee on Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Committee on Government Operations House of Representatives Dear Mr.
191. lappuse - Each agency shall base its decisions on the best reasonably obtainable scientific, technical, economic, and other information concerning the need for, and consequences of, the intended regulation.
71. lappuse - UNREASONABLE ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT. — The term "unreasonable adverse effects on the environment" means any unreasonable risk to man or the environment, taking into account the economic, social, and environmental costs and benefits of the use of any pesticide.
185. lappuse - EPA laws such as the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) have the clear potential in certain circumstances to ban substances that are of particular danger.
41. lappuse - Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities...
125. lappuse - ACT before the SUBCOMMITTEE ON LEGISLATION AND NATIONAL SECURITY Of the HOUSE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS for the US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE by Carol Miller and Dr.
191. lappuse - In setting regulatory priorities, each agency shall consider, to the extent reasonable, the degree and nature of the risks posed by various substances or activities within its jurisdiction.
1. lappuse - COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS, Washington, DC. The subcommittees met, pursuant to notice, at 10 am, in room 2154, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon.
129. lappuse - our regulatory system badly prioritizes the health and environmental risks we face.'* Judge Breyer's view is widely shared. Many close observers of the process have stressed that during the last two decades, "environmental policy has too often evolved largely in reaction to popular panics, not in response to sound scientific analyses of which environmental hazards present the greatest risks.■...
3. lappuse - The American people deserve a regulatory system that works for them, not against them: a regulatory system that protects and improves their health, safety, environment, and well-being and improves the performance of the economy without imposing unacceptable or unreasonable costs on society...