Violence in the Media: Antitrust Implications of Self-regulation and Constitutionality of Government Action : Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Second Session, September 20 and 21, 2000, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 2001 - 102 lappuses |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action advertising Amendment Answer anti anti-competitive antitrust exemption antitrust immunity antitrust laws appropriate believe bill broadcasters Chairman Pitofsky code of conduct committee competition concerns Congress consumers Dreamworks SKG effective efforts entertainment industry entertainment products Federal Trade Commission films FTC report FTC's group boycott guidelines home video IDSA inappropriate industry's issue JACK VALENTI kids labeling systems legislation manufacturers marketing marketplace material ment motion picture movies and video MPAA NARM Parental Advisory percent Pledge to Parents products to children programs proposed protection R-rated movies rated games rated or labeled rating and labeling rating system ratings enforcement record regulation RESPONSE TO QUESTION restrict retail level RIAA Robert Pitofsky sale doctrine sanctions self-regulation self-regulatory sell Senator KOHL SENATOR LEAHY Software standards studios sumers suppliers tainment target tion trust laws U.S. SENATOR video game ratings video retailers video stores violations violence violent entertainment voluntary VSDA Wal-Mart
Populāri fragmenti
100. lappuse - It is the right of the viewers and listeners, not the right of the broadcasters, which is paramount.
76. lappuse - Congress shall have power to promote the progress of science and the useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries, and to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers.
101. lappuse - ... been seized or banned by the State, and that no one has been prosecuted for their possession or sale. But though the Commission is limited to informal sanctions — the threat of invoking legal sanctions and other means of coercion, persuasion, and intimidation — the record amply demonstrates that the Commission deliberately set about to achieve the suppression of publications deemed "objectionable
37. lappuse - In sum, the Rule of Reason does not support a defense based on the assumption that competition itself is unreasonable.
32. lappuse - In addition, Section 5 of the FTC Act prohibits "unfair methods of competition and '[unfair or deceptive acts or practices," thus giving the Commission responsibilities in both the antitrust and consumer protection areas. The Commission also provides advice and guidance on competition issues, based upon its substantial experience in applying antitrust principles across many different industries.
76. lappuse - ... state compulsion" test, the nexus" test, and the "joint action" test). It concluded that, regardless of the test used, "the first question is whether the claimed deprivation has resulted form the exercise of a right or privilege having its source in state authority. The second question is whether, under the facts of this case, respondents, who are private parties, may be appropriately characterized as 'state actors.
38. lappuse - Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co., 472 US 284 (1985) (exclusion of a competitor from a purchasing cooperative not per se unlawful absent a showing of market power).
37. lappuse - The Society's affirmative defense confirms rather than refutes the anticompetitive purpose and effect of its agreement. The Society argues that the restraint is justified because bidding on engineering services is inherently imprecise, would lead to deceptively low bids, and would thereby tempt individual engineers to do inferior work with consequent risk to public safety and health.
32. lappuse - Legislation calling for the FTC and the Justice Department to conduct such a study was introduced in both houses of Congress following the Columbine incident. See Amendment No. 329 by Senator Brownback et al. to the Violent and Repeat Juvenile Offender Accountability and Rehabilitation Act of 1999, S.
33. lappuse - Do the industries promote products they themselves acknowledge warrant parental caution in venues where children make up a substantial percentage of the audience, and (2) are these advertisements intended to attract children and teenagers?