Agriculture Decisions: Decisions of the Secretary of Agriculture Under the Regulatory Laws Administered in the United States Department of Agriculture, 57. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1998 Up to 1988, the December issue contained a cumulative list of decisions reported for the year, by act, docket numbers arranged in consecutive order, and cumulative subject-index, by act. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
843. lappuse
... June 5 , 1998 the court issued an order stating that it was taking the pending motions for summary judgment under submission . LEGAL STANDARD Summary judgment shall be granted when the undisputed facts entitle the moving party to ...
... June 5 , 1998 the court issued an order stating that it was taking the pending motions for summary judgment under submission . LEGAL STANDARD Summary judgment shall be granted when the undisputed facts entitle the moving party to ...
856. lappuse
... June 25 , 1992 is affirmed . ORDER For the reasons stated in the above Memorandum Opinion , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1. Balice's motion for summary judgment is DENIED ; 2. the USDA's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED ; and 3. the ...
... June 25 , 1992 is affirmed . ORDER For the reasons stated in the above Memorandum Opinion , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 1. Balice's motion for summary judgment is DENIED ; 2. the USDA's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED ; and 3. the ...
861. lappuse
... June 16 , 1998 . II . DISCUSSION The Secretary makes three arguments in support of the motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint . As explained below , the court rejects the first and second arguments , but finds the third argument ...
... June 16 , 1998 . II . DISCUSSION The Secretary makes three arguments in support of the motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint . As explained below , the court rejects the first and second arguments , but finds the third argument ...
906. lappuse
... June 1 , 1998 , Respondent filed objections to Complainant's Motion for Default Decision and Proposed Default Decision . On June 16 , 1998 , Administrative Law Judge Dorothea A. Baker [ hereinafter ALJ ] issued a Default Decision and ...
... June 1 , 1998 , Respondent filed objections to Complainant's Motion for Default Decision and Proposed Default Decision . On June 16 , 1998 , Administrative Law Judge Dorothea A. Baker [ hereinafter ALJ ] issued a Default Decision and ...
915. lappuse
... June 24 , 1998 , in accordance with section 1.139 of the Rules of Practice ( 7 C.F.R. § 1.139 ) , Complainant filed a Motion for Adoption of Proposed Default Decision and Order [ hereinafter Motion for Default Decision ] and a Proposed ...
... June 24 , 1998 , in accordance with section 1.139 of the Rules of Practice ( 7 C.F.R. § 1.139 ) , Complainant filed a Motion for Adoption of Proposed Default Decision and Order [ hereinafter Motion for Default Decision ] and a Proposed ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
57 Agric 9th Cir Administrative Law Judge Administrative Procedure Act ALJ's Animal Welfare Act APHIS Appeal Petition Applicants Beef Marketing Agreement Beef Marketing Group Caito & Mascari cartons cattle cease and desist Chief ALJ civil penalty Complaint corporation court D.C. Cir dealer Decision and Order Default Decision default order proper Department of Agriculture dismiss dogs due process evidence failed feedlots Fifth Amendment file an answer Findings of Fact handlers Hearing Clerk hereinafter holding the default Initial Decision inspection Judicial Officer Kevin Martin Linn County livestock Melogold Mendenhall Produce PACA Packers and Stockyards Perishable Agricultural Commodities Petitioner Practice 7 C.F.R. Promoflor Promotion and Information purchase pursuant record Regulations 9 C.F.R. Respondent filed Respondent's Appeal responsibly connected Rules of Practice sanction Seventh Amendment Sol Salins Standards 9 C.F.R. Stockyards Act surety bond United States Department USDA violated section violation of section Wileman Bros
Populāri fragmenti
1031. lappuse - When the presiding employee makes an initial decision, that decision then becomes the decision of the agency without further proceedings unless there is an appeal to, or review on motion of, the agency within time provided by rule. On appeal from or review of the initial decision, the agency has all the powers which it would have in making the initial decision except as it may limit the issues on notice or by rule.
1352. lappuse - If upon such hearing the Commission shall be of the opinion that the method of competition or the act or practice in question is prohibited by this Act, it shall make a report in writing in which it shall state its findings as to the facts...
881. lappuse - This power, like all others vested in congress, is complete in itself, may be exercised to its utmost extent, and acknowledges no limitations other than are prescribed in the constitution.
1041. lappuse - Any oral or documentary evidence may be received, but the agency as a matter of policy shall provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. A sanction may not be imposed or rule or order issued except on consideration of the whole record or those parts thereof cited by a party and supported by and in accordance with the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence.
1100. lappuse - An employee or agent engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions for an agency in a case may not, in that or a factually related case, participate or advise in the decision, recommended decision, or agency review...
1369. lappuse - Persons entitled to notice of an agency hearing shall be timely informed of (1) the time, place, and nature thereof; (2) the legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held; and (3) the matters of fact and law asserted.
1031. lappuse - When the agency makes the decision without having presided at the reception of the evidence, the presiding employee or an employee qualified to preside at hearings pursuant to section...
1264. lappuse - A person compelled to appear in person before an agency or representative thereof is entitled to be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel or, if permitted by the agency, by other qualified representative. A party is entitled to appear in person or by or with counsel or other duly qualified representative in an agency proceeding.
1129. lappuse - ... that an increase in the cost of living or a special factor, such as the limited availability of qualified attorneys or agents for the proceedings involved, justifies a higher fee.); (B) "party...