Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Hearings ... 19511951 - 229 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 54.
3. lappuse
... determining whether the evidence is substantial . This provision has recently been examined by the Supreme Court in ... determine the appeal upon the recor andd the evidence , and alter or revise the decision appealed from - in short ...
... determining whether the evidence is substantial . This provision has recently been examined by the Supreme Court in ... determine the appeal upon the recor andd the evidence , and alter or revise the decision appealed from - in short ...
4. lappuse
... determine if there was substantial evidence to support the finding , and of course , upon constitutional questions , may be had . " To permit a review by trial de novo at the level of the court of appeals would not only impede and ...
... determine if there was substantial evidence to support the finding , and of course , upon constitutional questions , may be had . " To permit a review by trial de novo at the level of the court of appeals would not only impede and ...
8. lappuse
... requires that a court in determining whether or not an order of an administrative agency under review is " unsupported by substantial evidence " shall " review the whole record 8 FEDERAL FOOD , DRUG , AND COSMETIC ACT.
... requires that a court in determining whether or not an order of an administrative agency under review is " unsupported by substantial evidence " shall " review the whole record 8 FEDERAL FOOD , DRUG , AND COSMETIC ACT.
9. lappuse
... determining whether there was substantial evidence to justify the conclusion must take into account the whole record ... determine the substan- tiality of evidence supporting a labor board decision merely on the basis of evi- dence which ...
... determining whether there was substantial evidence to justify the conclusion must take into account the whole record ... determine the substan- tiality of evidence supporting a labor board decision merely on the basis of evi- dence which ...
13. lappuse
... determining the class in which it belongs . This statement has the significance that it is the basic theory of the act to make the producer of a subject article initially responsible for general compliance with it , subject to the rules ...
... determining the class in which it belongs . This statement has the significance that it is the basic theory of the act to make the producer of a subject article initially responsible for general compliance with it , subject to the rules ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
adequate directions Administrative Procedure Act agency amendment American Pharmaceutical Association authority barbital barbiturates BECKWORTH Benzedrine bill CHAIRMAN circuit court CLUTTER committee Congress Cosmetic Act counter counts court of appeals dangerous drugs dentist Dexedrine dispensed doctor DOLLIVER Drug Administration drug manufacturers drug or device Drug Store efficacy EWING exempt FDC Act Federal Food Federal Security Federal Security Agency FISCHELIS Food and Drug Guilty HALE HARROP hearing HESELTON LARRICK legislation licensed by law medicine misbranded narcotics Nembutal Nolo contendere O'HARA oral prescription Over-the-counter package patient pharmacist pharmacy phenobarbital physician Plea practice practitioner licensed prescriber prescription drug prescription legend prescription-drug law present law problem profession professional prohibited proposed provision public health question refilling of prescriptions regulations restriction Retail Druggists Robert Crosser scription Seconal section 502 sold statement sulfadiazine Sulfathiazole supervision telephone prescriptions tion trial de novo veterinarian WALLER WARNACK WOLVERTON written prescription
Populāri fragmenti
17. lappuse - ... generally recognized, among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate its safety, as having been adequately shown through scientific procedures (or, in the case of a substance used in food prior to January 1, 1958.
205. lappuse - ... immunity; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (4) without observance of procedure required by law; (5) unsupported by substantial evidence in any case subject to the requirements of sections 7 and 8 or otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute; or (6) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court. In making the foregoing determinations the court...
36. lappuse - ... the United States court of appeals for the circuit wherein such person resides or has his principal place of business...
204. lappuse - To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.
34. lappuse - ... because of its toxicity or other potentiality for harmful effect, or the method of its use, or the collateral measures necessary to its use...
20. lappuse - Unless its labeling bears (1) adequate directions for use; and (2) such adequate warnings against use in those pathological conditions or by children where its use may be dangerous to health, or against unsafe dosage or methods or duration of administration or application, in such manner and form, as are necessary for the protection of users...
81. lappuse - A drug intended for veterinary use which, because of toxicity or other potentiality for harmful effect, or the method of its use, is not safe for animal use except under the supervision of a licensed veterinarian, and hence for which "adequate directions for use...
205. lappuse - The reviewing court shall: (1) compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed; and (2) hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be — (a) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law...
211. lappuse - ... arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right...
5. lappuse - Upon the filing of the petition referred to in paragraph (1) of this subsection, the court shall have jurisdiction to affirm the order, or to set it aside in whole or in part, temporarily or permanently. If the order of the...