Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Hearings ... 19511951 - 229 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 41.
3. lappuse
... decision of the Administrator with respect to that pro- posal is made ; ( 4 ) objections to the decision may be filed within 30 days , with a request for a public hearing on such objections ; ( 5 ) a hearing on the objections is held ...
... decision of the Administrator with respect to that pro- posal is made ; ( 4 ) objections to the decision may be filed within 30 days , with a request for a public hearing on such objections ; ( 5 ) a hearing on the objections is held ...
6. lappuse
... decision . A question arises as to whether such a function is within the judicial power conferred upon Federal courts by the Constitution . Compare Radio Commission v . General Electric Co. ( 281 U. S. 464 ) . It might be desirable to ...
... decision . A question arises as to whether such a function is within the judicial power conferred upon Federal courts by the Constitution . Compare Radio Commission v . General Electric Co. ( 281 U. S. 464 ) . It might be desirable to ...
7. lappuse
... decision of appeals from orders of administra- tive agencies by the courts of appeals upon the record made before the agencies . This procedure has been repeatedly provided for by the Congress , most recently by a law passed at the end ...
... decision of appeals from orders of administra- tive agencies by the courts of appeals upon the record made before the agencies . This procedure has been repeatedly provided for by the Congress , most recently by a law passed at the end ...
8. lappuse
... decisions of administrative agencies by the courts and the evidence necessary to sustain them were recently considered at ... decision , that would be enough to satisfy the test of substantial evidence irrespective of other parts of the ...
... decisions of administrative agencies by the courts and the evidence necessary to sustain them were recently considered at ... decision , that would be enough to satisfy the test of substantial evidence irrespective of other parts of the ...
9. lappuse
... decision of an administrative agency if supported by substantial evidence , but made it unmistakably clear that the reviewing court in determining whether there was substantial evidence to justify the conclusion must take into account ...
... decision of an administrative agency if supported by substantial evidence , but made it unmistakably clear that the reviewing court in determining whether there was substantial evidence to justify the conclusion must take into account ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
adequate directions Administrative Procedure Act agency amendment American Pharmaceutical Association authority barbital barbiturates BECKWORTH Benzedrine bill CHAIRMAN circuit court CLUTTER committee Congress Cosmetic Act counter counts court of appeals dangerous drugs dentist Dexedrine dispensed doctor DOLLIVER Drug Administration drug manufacturers drug or device Drug Store efficacy EWING exempt FDC Act Federal Food Federal Security Federal Security Agency FISCHELIS Food and Drug Guilty HALE HARROP hearing HESELTON LARRICK legislation licensed by law medicine misbranded narcotics Nembutal Nolo contendere O'HARA oral prescription Over-the-counter package patient pharmacist pharmacy phenobarbital physician Plea practice practitioner licensed prescriber prescription drug prescription legend prescription-drug law present law problem profession professional prohibited proposed provision public health question refilling of prescriptions regulations restriction Retail Druggists Robert Crosser scription Seconal section 502 sold statement sulfadiazine Sulfathiazole supervision telephone prescriptions tion trial de novo veterinarian WALLER WARNACK WOLVERTON written prescription
Populāri fragmenti
17. lappuse - ... generally recognized, among experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate its safety, as having been adequately shown through scientific procedures (or, in the case of a substance used in food prior to January 1, 1958.
205. lappuse - ... immunity; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right; (4) without observance of procedure required by law; (5) unsupported by substantial evidence in any case subject to the requirements of sections 7 and 8 or otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute; or (6) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court. In making the foregoing determinations the court...
36. lappuse - ... the United States court of appeals for the circuit wherein such person resides or has his principal place of business...
204. lappuse - To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional and statutory provisions, and determine the meaning or applicability of the terms of an agency action.
34. lappuse - ... because of its toxicity or other potentiality for harmful effect, or the method of its use, or the collateral measures necessary to its use...
20. lappuse - Unless its labeling bears (1) adequate directions for use; and (2) such adequate warnings against use in those pathological conditions or by children where its use may be dangerous to health, or against unsafe dosage or methods or duration of administration or application, in such manner and form, as are necessary for the protection of users...
81. lappuse - A drug intended for veterinary use which, because of toxicity or other potentiality for harmful effect, or the method of its use, is not safe for animal use except under the supervision of a licensed veterinarian, and hence for which "adequate directions for use...
205. lappuse - The reviewing court shall: (1) compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed; and (2) hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be (a) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law...
211. lappuse - ... arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (3) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right...
5. lappuse - Upon the filing of the petition referred to in paragraph (1) of this subsection, the court shall have jurisdiction to affirm the order, or to set it aside in whole or in part, temporarily or permanently. If the order of the...