The Pacific Reporter, 173. sējumsWest Publishing Company, 1918 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
9. lappuse
... question is whether the evi- dence supports the finding of the jury that the defendant's storekeeper knowingly sold plaintiff a grade of dynamite of a higher percentage than that asked for . Upon this question the evidence was ...
... question is whether the evi- dence supports the finding of the jury that the defendant's storekeeper knowingly sold plaintiff a grade of dynamite of a higher percentage than that asked for . Upon this question the evidence was ...
52. lappuse
... question of whether the restraining order had become in effect a temporary in- junction was a question the trial court had jurisdiction to decide at any time before final judgment . It seems equally clear to us that the question of ...
... question of whether the restraining order had become in effect a temporary in- junction was a question the trial court had jurisdiction to decide at any time before final judgment . It seems equally clear to us that the question of ...
94. lappuse
... question whether a passenger leaving a mov - substantially from Carr v . Eel River , 98 ing train is guilty of contributory negligence Cal . 366 , 33 Pac . 213 , 21 L. R. A. 354 , and is in this state a question for the jury . The ...
... question whether a passenger leaving a mov - substantially from Carr v . Eel River , 98 ing train is guilty of contributory negligence Cal . 366 , 33 Pac . 213 , 21 L. R. A. 354 , and is in this state a question for the jury . The ...
96. lappuse
... question " included within the boundaries of a temporary forest with- drawal . " The letter proceeds : " An examination of the records of this office shows that the above - described lands were in- cluded in departmental withdrawal of ...
... question " included within the boundaries of a temporary forest with- drawal . " The letter proceeds : " An examination of the records of this office shows that the above - described lands were in- cluded in departmental withdrawal of ...
97. lappuse
... question as to time refers only to the time when the state desires to take the land . Can the state take the section in place now ? Evidently not , because it has been re- served and withheld from sale . When the reservation exists , no ...
... question as to time refers only to the time when the state desires to take the land . Can the state take the section in place now ? Evidently not , because it has been re- served and withheld from sale . When the reservation exists , no ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
affirmed agreement alleged amended amount appellant applied assessment Bank bond cause of action charge claim Cleveland county Code Colo complaint concur contended contract contributory negligence corporation damages deceased decree deed defendant's demurrer denied Deschutes county Digests and Indexes District Court EMINENT DOMAIN employé entitled estoppel evidence fact favor fendant filed findings ground held injury instruction interest issue Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Key-Numbered Digests King County land liability lien mandamus ment mortgage motion negligence notice opinion owner paid parties payment person petition petitioner plain plaintiff in error pleadings proceedings purchase purpose question railroad reason received recover Rehearing remittitur rendered respondent rule Stat statute Superior Court Supreme Court surety testified testimony thereof tiff tion topic and KEY-NUMBER trial court trust Utah verdict Wash witness writ
Populāri fragmenti
350. lappuse - The cause of action in such case not to be deemed to have accrued until the discovery, by the aggrieved party, of the facts constituting the fraud or mistake.
400. lappuse - When there is reason to believe that an impartial trial cannot be had therein ; 3. When the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change.
379. lappuse - All property, not exempted from taxation by this Constitution, shall be assessed for taxation at its fair cash value, estimated at the price it would bring at a fair voluntary sale...
74. lappuse - All laws should receive a sensible construction. General terms should be so limited in their application as not to lead to injustice, oppression, or an absurd consequence. It will always, therefore, be presumed that the legislature intended exceptions to its language, which would avoid results of this character. The reason of the law in such cases should prevail over its letter.
101. lappuse - In an action against several defendants, the court may, in its discretion, render judgment against one or more of them, leaving the action to proceed against the others, whenever a several judgment may be proper.
378. lappuse - The fundamental rule in construing statutes is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the legislature.
313. lappuse - ... 1. Actual annexation to the realty, or something appurtenant thereto. 2. Appropriation to the use or purpose of that part of the realty with which it is connected. 3. The intention of the party making the annexation, to make the article a permanent accession to the freehold...
73. lappuse - ... sometimes by considering the cause and necessity of making the act, sometimes by comparing one part of the act with another, and sometimes by foreign circumstances. So that they have ever been guided by the intent of the legislature, which they have always taken according to the necessity of the matter and according to that which is consonant to reason and good discretion.
99. lappuse - The location must be distinctly marked on the ground so that its boundaries can be readily traced. All records of mining claims hereafter made shall contain the name or names of the locators, the date of the location, and such a description of the claim or claims located by reference to some natural object or permanent monument as will identify the claim. On each claim located after the tenth day of May, eighteen hundred and seventy-two, and until a patent has been issued therefor, not less than...
226. lappuse - It is admitted that the rule is difficult of application. But it is generally held that, in order to warrant a finding that negligence or an act not amounting to wanton wrong is the proximate cause of an injury, it must appear that the injury was the natural and probable consequence of the negligence or wrongful act, and that it ought to have been foreseen in the light of the attending circumstances.