National Park System Review Board: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands of the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, Second Session, on H.R. 3964 ... Hearing Held in Washington, DC, May 10, 1988, 4. sējums
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Subcommittee on National Parks and Public Lands
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1989 - 197 lappuses
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
action activities administration advisory agency appointed appropriate approval areas asked Assistant authority believe bill Board budget Chairman committee concerns Congress Congressional conservation constitutional continue create cultural deal decision Department direction Director duties effective employees established executive existing fact Federal functions funding future going hearing historic preservation HORN House important independent individuals interest Interior involved issue kind land legislation LIBRARY OF CONGRESS look mandate meet Mott National Park Service National Park System natural objection operation organization performance person personnel political position present preservation President problems professional proposed protection questions recommendations record recreation regard removal request responsibility Review Board Secretary Senate serve staff statement Subcommittee suggest testimony Thank things tion understand United VENTO
188. lappuse - Congress created the Bureau of the Budget (now the Office of Management and Budget) to review the morass of agency budgetary information and to approve agency budget requests.
83. lappuse - ... to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wild life therein and to provide for the enjoyment of the same in such manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations.
191. lappuse - The power of the Congress to conduct investigations is inherent in the legislative process. That power is broad. It encompasses inquiries concerning the administration of existing laws as well as proposed or possibly needed statutes. It includes surveys of defects in our social, economic or political system for the purpose of enabling the Congress to remedy them. It comprehends probes into departments of the Federal Government to expose corruption, inefficiency or waste.
192. lappuse - A legislative body cannot legislate wisely or effectively in the absence of information respecting the conditions which the legislation is intended to affect or change ; and where the legislative body does not itself possess the requisite information which not infrequently is true recourse must be had to others who do possess it.
78. lappuse - Members shall hold office for a term of 5 years and may be removed by the President only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.
179. lappuse - But when the legislature proceeds to impose on that officer other duties ; when he is directed peremptorily to perform certain acts ; when the rights of individuals are dependent on the performance of those acts ; he is so far the officer of the law ; is amenable to the laws for his conduct ; and cannot at his discretion sport away the vested rights of others.
180. lappuse - Affairs, and that there shall be a principal officer therein, to be called the Secretary for the Department of Foreign Affairs,1 who shall perform and execute such duties as shall from time to time be enjoined on or entrusted to him by the President of the United States...
186. lappuse - The Perkins case is limited to the vesting by Congress of the appointment of an inferior officer in the head of a department. The condition upon which the power of Congress to provide for the removal of inferior officers rests is that it shall vest the appointment in some one other than the President with the consent of the Senate.
184. lappuse - And what is the essence of the decision in Humphrey's case? It drew a sharp line of cleavage between officials who were part of the Executive establishment and were thus removable by virtue of the President's constitutional powers, and those who are members of a body "to exercise its judgment without the leave or hindrance of any other official or any department of the...