Meklēšana Attēli Maps Play YouTube Ziņas Gmail Disks Vēl »
Ieiet
Grāmatas Grāmatas
" In an action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by an employee in the course of his employment, or for death resulting from personal injury so sustained, it shall not be a defense : 1. That the employee was negligent; 2. That the injury... "
Labor Bulletin - 136. lappuse
autors: Massachusetts. Department of Labor and Industries. Division of Statistics - 1911
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Acts Passed at the ... Session of the General Assembly for the Commonwealth ...

Kentucky - 1916 - 804 lapas
...upon any or all of the following grounds : (1) That the employe was guilty of contributory negligence. (2) That the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant of the injured employe. (3) That the employe has assumed the risk of injury. § 76b. Every...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Michigan Reports: Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan, 188. sējums

Michigan. Supreme Court, Randolph Manning, George C. Gibbs, Thomas McIntyre Cooley, Elijah W. Meddaugh, William Jennison, Hovey K. Clarke, Hoyt Post, Henry Allen Chaney, William Dudley Fuller, John Adams Brooks, Marquis B. Eaton, Herschel Bouton Lazell, James M. Reasoner, Richard W. Cooper - 1916 - 812 lapas
...by the act. The defenses referred to are: (1) That the employee was negligent, unless wilfully so; (2) that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant; (3) that the employee had assumed the risks inherent in, incidental to, or arising out of...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

The Southwestern Reporter, 171. sējums

1915 - 1336 lapas
...statute enacted for the safety of the employes contributed to the injury or death of such employé. "2. That the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow employé. "3. That the employe had assumed the risk of the injury incident to his employment; but such...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

The Southwestern Reporter, 222. sējums

1920 - 1206 lapas
...employment, it shall not be a defense: (1) That the employe was guilty of contributory negligence ; (2) that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow employé; (3) but said article further provides that the employer may defend upon the ground that the...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics

1913 - 1314 lapas
...employment, or for death gated. resulting from personal injury so sustained, it shall not be a defense: 1. That the employee was negligent; 2. That the injury...That the employee had assumed the risk of the injury. Farm laborers, SEC. 2. The provisions of section one shall not apply to actions to etc- recover damages...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Texas State Journal of Medicine, 13. sējums

1918 - 454 lapas
...so sustained, it shall not be a defense: 1. That the employe was guilty of contributory negligence. 2. That the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow employe. 3. That the employe had assumed the risk of the injury Incident to his employment; but such...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Lawyers' Reports Annotated, 24. grāmata

1910 - 1412 lapas
...( 1 ) That there was no evidence from which the jury could find the defendant guilty of negligence; (2) that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant; and (3) that the plaintiff assumed the risk. It is argued that the plaintiff failed to show...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. no ..., 95. izdevums

1911 - 388 lapas
...his employment, or for death resulting from personal injury so sustained, it shall not be a defense: 1. That the employee was negligent ; 2. That the injury...their reference to negligence as meaning contributory iijpence or negligence on the part of a fellow servant which falls short of the serious and willful...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

Report of the West Virginia Employers' Liability and Laborers ..., 1. daļa

West Virginia. Employers' Liability and Laborers' Compensation Commission - 1911 - 282 lapas
...his employment, or for death resulting from personal injury so sustained, it shall not be a defense: 1. That the employee was negligent; 2. That the injury...That the employee had assumed the risk of the injury. Sec. 2. The provisions of section one shall not apply to actions to recover damages for personal injuries...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu

The Worcester Magazine: Devoted to Good Citizenship and ..., 14. sējums

1911 - 416 lapas
...his employment, or for death resulting from personal injury so sustained, it shall not be a defense : 1. That the employee was negligent; 2. That the injury...That the employee had assumed the risk of the injury. SECTION 2. The provisions of section one shall not apply to actions to recover damages for personal...
Pilnskats - Par šo grāmatu




  1. Mana bibliotēka
  2. Palīdzība
  3. Izvērstā grāmatu meklēšana
  4. Lejupielādējiet ePub
  5. Lejupielādēt PDF