...continued effectiveness on the citizens' abdication through unawareness of their constitutional rights. No system worth preserving should have to fear that...enforcement, then there is something very wrong with that system.14 We hold, therefore, that where, as here, the investigation is no longer a general inquiry...

...continued effectiveness on the citizens' abdication through unawareness of their constitutional rights. No system worth preserving should have to fear that...enforcement then there is something very wrong with that system. In the Escobedo case the right to remain silent has been reinforced by the right to counsel....

...depend for its continued effectlvele citizens' abdication through unawareness of their constitutional > system worth preserving should have to fear that if an accused is to consult with a lawyer, he will become aware of, and exercise, these the exercise of constitutional...

...the parallel between this situation and the situation in Escobedo is clear. The court there said : No system worth preserving should have to fear that...will become aware of and exercise these rights. If he exercises constitutional rights, then there is something very wrong with that system. Senator LONG....

...one wonders what new light supported the statement in Escobcdo v. Illinois, 378 is 478, 490 (1964) , "No system worth preserving should have to fear that...become aware of, and exercise, these rights" — if, which is by no means dear, sec Escobedo, supra at 492, this refers to police interrogation in a bona...

...continued effectiveness on the citizens' abdiction through unawareness of their constitutional rights. No system worth preserving should have to fear that...will become aware of, 'and exercise, these rights." Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 US 478 (1964). The thought is particularly appropriate to the Selective Service...

..."lesson of history" that our system of justice is not founded on a fear that a suspect will exercise his rights. "If the exercise of constitutional rights...enforcement, then there is something very wrong with that system." Id., at 490. In Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966), we similarly stressed this character...

...interrogation room would diminish significantly the number of confessions obtained, but concluded: If the exercise of constitutional rights will thwart...enforcement, then there is something very wrong with that system. . . . We have learned the lesson of history, ancient and modern, that a system of criminal...

...procedural stages. But the Supreme Court has already expressed this aptly in Escobedo v. Illinois (1964):8 "No system worth preserving should have to fear that...enforcement, then there is something very wrong with that system." Another objection is that defendants would be forced to be represented by counsel even if...

...which depends on extrinsic evidence independently secured through skillful investigation. . . . . . . No system worth preserving should have to fear that...enforcement, then there is something very wrong with that system.44 The sweeping language and broad implications of Escobedo greatly troubled, one might even...