FINDINGS. See Jurisdiction, III; Procedure, 8; Transportation, 3.

PINES. See Constitutional Law, V; Oriminal Law, 5-6; Contempt,

1-2.

FIRST AMENDMENT. See Constitutional Law, III, 1, 2; IV.
FLORIDA. See Constitutional Law, VII, 1; Divorce.
FOREIGN COMMEROE. See Constitutional Law, VI, 2; Taxa

INDEMNITY. See Admiralty, 1.

INDIANS.

1. Ute Indians—Compensation for lands—Right of recovery.-Ute
Indians without compensable interest in lands made available to
them by 1875 Executive Order which were outside of 1868 treaty
boundary; 1880 Act did not convey or ratify conveyance of such
lands. Ute Indians v. U. S., 169.

2. Indian treaties—Construction. Construction of treaty with In-
dians as affected by their understanding. Id.
INDICTMENT. See also Jurisdiction, II, 1.

Sufficiency. Sufficiency of indictment charging conspiracy to vio-
late Sherman Act. Brotherhood of Carpenters v. U. S., 395.
INFORMATION. See Jurisdiction, II, 1.
INJUNCTION.

1. Propriety-Fair Labor Standards Act.-Denial to Wage-Hour
Administrator of injunction as to group of employees as to whom
the employer had been complying with Act, sustained. Walling v.
Nashville, C. & St. L. R. Co., 158.

2. Injunction against strike-Statutory restrictions Suit by Gov-
ernment.--Injunction against strike in government-operated coal
mines pending judicial interpretation of contract with labor union;
contempt of restraining order; propriety of procedure and penalty.
U.S. v. United Mine Workers, 258.
INSOLVENCY. See Priority.
INSTRUCTIONS TO JURY. See Trial, 3.
INTERNAL REVENUE. See Criminal Law, 2.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE. See Constitutional Law, VI, 1-2;

Taxation, 2; Transportation, 1-3.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. See Labor, 7; Trans-

portation, 3.
JEOPARDY. See Constitutional Law, V.
JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING VERDIOT. See Procedure, 4.
JUDGMENTS. See also Constitutional Law, V; VII, 1-3; Divorce;

Procedure, 4.
Res judicata—Effect of state court judgment in federal court-
Diversity jurisdiction. State court judgment as adjudication on mer-
its barring relitigation in federal court. Angel v. Bullington, 183.

JURISDICTION. See also Admiralty, 1; Constitutional Law, II,

1-2; VII, 1-3; Contempt, 2; Procedure.

I. In General, p. 865.
II. Supreme Court, p. 866.
III. Circuit Courts of Appeals, p. 866.

IV. District Courts, p. 866.
References to particular subjects under title Jurisdiction.--Amount
in Controversy, IV, 2; Case or Controversy, I, 2-3; Certiorari, II,
3; Clayton Act, I, 1; Contempt, I, 5; Criminal Appeals Act, II, 1;
Derivative Suit, IV, 4; Direct Appeal, II, 1-2; Diversity Jurisdiction,
I, 4; IV, 2-4; Findings, III; Forum Non Conveniens, IV, 3-4;
Hatch Act, I, 2-3, 7; Immigration Act, II, 1; Injunction, I, 1-3;
Jurisdictional Amount, IV, 2; Labor Relations Act, I, 6; Mandate,
II, 4; Maritime Commission, IV, 1; Norris-LaGuardia Act, I, 1;
Remand, II, 4; Scope of Review, I, 5–7; State Courts, I, 4; II, 4;
States, I, 4, 7; Workmen's Compensation, IV, 2.
I. In General.

JURISDIOTION-Continued.
II. Supreme Court.

1. Criminal Appeals Act—Direct appeal.-Dismissal of information
by District Court based on construction of Immigration Act appeal-
able directly to Supreme Court. U. S. v. Hoy, 724.

2. Direct appeal from three-judge court-Act of August 24, 1937—
Docketing.-Where appeal not docketed within 60 days of allowance,
but appellee takes no steps under Rule 11 to dismiss, this Court has
jurisdiction. United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 75.

3. Review of C. C. A.-Certiorari.-Respondent may assert as
sustaining judgment ground rejected below. Walling v. General
Industries Co., 545.

4. Review of C.C.A.- Order of remand.-Circuit Court of Appeals'
remand to state court reviewable, though mandate has issued. Aetna
Casualty Co. v. Flowers, 464.
D. Circuit Courts of Appeals.

Scope of review-Findings of fact.-Findings of fact by District
Court, on conflicting evidence and inferences drawn therefrom, should
not be rejected unless clearly wrong. Walling v. General Industries
Co., 545.
IV. District Courts.

LABOR Continued.
had refused to certify, violated National Labor Relations Act. Beth-
lebem Steel Co. v. State Board, 767.

2. National Labor Relations Act-Collective bargaining-Fore-
men.-Foremen as entitled to rights of self-organization, collective
bargaining, etc. Packard Co. v. Labor Board, 485.

3. Id.-Determination by Board of appropriate bargaining repre-
sentative; scope of judicial review. Id.

4. National Labor Relations Act—Proceedings before Board
Fairness.-Order of Board requiring disestablishment of plant union
sustained; effect of remand by C. C. A.; rebearing by same examiner;
admission and exclusion of evidence; scope of judicial review. Labor
Board v. Donnelly Garment Co., 219.

5. Fair Labor Standards Act—Coverage-Learners.-Trainees for
jobs as railroad firemen, brakemen and switchmen not "employees"
under Act. Walling v. Portland Terminal Co., 148; Walling v. Nash-
ville, C. & St. L. R. Co., 158.

6. Fair Labor Standards Act-Coverage-"Executives.”—Exemp-
tion of operating engineers as employed in "executive" capacity.
Walling v. General Industries Co., 545.

7. Fair Labor Standards Act-Coverage-Exceptions–Jurisdiction
of 1. C. C.-Employees as to whom I. C. C. bas power under Motor
Carrier Act to establish qualifications and maximum hours of service;
"loaders" of freight for interstate motor carrier; scope of power of
I. C. C. as to employees engaged only part of time as loaders; prin-
ciples determining status of employees. Levinson v. Spector Motor
Service, 649; Pyramid Motor Freight Corp. v. Ispass, 695.

8. Fair Labor Standards Act-Enforcement-Injunction.-Denial
to Administrator of injunction as to group of employees is to whom
the employer had been complying with Act, sustained. Walling v.
Nashville, C. & St. L. R. Co., 158.

9. Norris - LaGuardia Act-Organizations-Liability-Authoriza-
tion.-Liability in labor disputes of employer or employee organization
or members for unlawful acts of officers or members; meaning of
"authorization.” Brotherhood of Carpenters v. U. S., 395.

10. Norris-LaGuardia Act-Clayton Act-War Labor Disputes
Act.-Injunction against strike in government-operated coal mines
pending judicial interpretation of contract with labor union; "em-
ployer" as not including Government. U. S. v. United Mine Workers,
258.
LABOR BOARD. See Constitutional Law, VI, 1; VIII, 2; Labor,