« iepriekšējāTurpināt »
(6) Is able to accommodate the national matches without interference to the training of Reserve components. The Chief of Reserve Components Division, Headquarters, 5th U.S. Army, agrees. In fact, substantial saving to the Government can be realized if competitive marksmanship and Re serve components both use Camp Atterbury.
(7) Has range facilities and expansion area within easy access (3 miles) of the housing area.
(8) Has exceptionally fine administrative setup and facilities for housing of administrative and visiting personnel in the form of two messes and bachelor-type quarters in the hospital area.
(9) Has an excellent trailer site which can readily be expanded and has 100 PHA family type units.
(10) Has an abundance of barracks and service buildings with mess buildings capable of being converted to small consolidated messes. b. Other pertinent data is tabulated in inclosure 5. 8. Findings.
a. The committee finds by unanimous vote that Camp Atterbury is the most suitable station in the United States for a future site for the national matches. No comparison was made with Camp Perry, Ohio, and no commitment is made in this paper which would select Camp Atterbury over Camp Perry or Camp Perry over Camp Atterbury. The committee wants to record incidentally that there are no major considerations to preclude the selection of Camp Breckinridge if for some reason Camp Atterbury has to be eliminated from consideration.
b. The committee further finds that approximately $3,512,000 is needed as an initial outlay to provide adequate first-class facilities for the national matches at Camp Atterbury.
c. The committee believes that the most optimistic date that a shift could be made from Camp Perry to Camp Atterbury would be for the 1958 matches,
9. Recommendations :
That Camp Atterbury be considered as the most suitable station in the United States (Camp Perry, Ohio, not considered) as a future site for the National Matches.
Engineer Section, CONARC.
S. C. CARPENTER,
Infantry Section, CONARC.
H. H. TARDY,
W. E. DAY,
R. W. BLANCHARD,
Civilian, (OCE) ODCSLOG, DA. Mr. Ford. Can we have put in the record this information we have requested every year, the ammunition issue on a chart basis showing what you have used starting with fiscal year 1959 ?
(The matter referred to appears on p. 384.) Colonel LEE. Yes, sir.
Mr. Ford. Also the chart material which shows participants supported by the National Board ?
Colonel LEE. I believe you have in mind bringing up to date the charts you have in last year's record.
Mr. FORD. Yes.
(The information to be supplied follows:)
Number of rifle clubs and schools enrolled with the Director of Civilian Marksmanship
at the end of fiscal years 1951-60
Individual members of rifle clubs and schools enrolled with the Director of
Civilian Marksmanship at the end of fiscal years 1951-60
Mr. WEAVER. On page 2 of your statement where you give the percentage breakdown of the age group, 12 to 18 years, 56 percent, what would the other 34 percent be as far as the age group is concerned ?
Colonel LEE. People over 18.
Colonel LEE. You will note, if you look at the same chart, from 19 to 25 years constitutes another 6.7 percent. Then 26 years and over, which would be the remainder, 37.5.
I point out school cadets, the last item in the chart, is a part of the 12- to 18-year group. That constitutes only 1.2 percent of our total, but they are under 18 years of age, the school cadet group.
Mr. MINSHALL. No questions.
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 8, 1961.
OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE, NAVY
WITNESSES VICE ADM. JOHN SYLVESTER, USN, DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL
OPERATIONS (LOGISTICS) VICE ADM. R. B. PIRIE, USN, DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERA
TIONS (AIR) VICE ADM. W. D. SMEDBERG III, USN, CHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNEL REAR ADM. P. D. STROOP, USN, CHIEF, BUREAU OF NAVAL WEAPONS REAR ADM. J. W. CRUMPACKER, USN, DIRECTOR, MATERIAL AND
BUDGET DIVISION, OFFICE OF CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS REAR ADM. E. J. PELTIER, CHIEF, BUREAU OF YARDS AND DOCKS
AND CHIEF OF CIVIL ENGINEERS CAPT. FRANK C. JONES, USN, COMPTROLLER, BUREAU OF SHIPS J. W. COCHRANE, COMPTROLLER, BUREAU OF YARDS AND DOCKS CAPT. A. C. HUSBAND, ASSISTANT CHIEF FOR ADMINISTRATION
AND COMPTROLLER, BUREAU OF YARDS AND DOCKS D. B. MEDLIN, ASSISTANT STATUS AND REVIEW OFFICER, BUREAU
OF NAVAL WEAPONS REAR ADM. L. ENSEY, USN, DEPUTY COMPTROLLER OF THE NAVY REAR ADM. M. A. HIRSCH, USN, ASSISTANT COMPTROLLER, DIREC
TOR OF BUDGET AND REPORTS
Total, personnel compensation..
11 Personnel compensation..
Services of other agencies.
nance and minor construction at Spanish base
to object classes 25, 26, and 31. Total, direct obligations
35 571, 273 157, 712 24, 432 1, 355
35 579, 838 43, 597 24, 257 1, 393
1,000 607, 030 58, 514 26,938 1, 454
2, 567, 431
2, 631, 700
2, 573, 694
See footnotes at end of table.
Object classification Continued
1961 estimate 1962 estimate
11 Personnel compensation.
213 66,219 56, 778 15, 223
163 8, 974
251 53, 106 47, 445 8, 568
259 44.029 37, 750 5, 480
Total, reimbursable obligations.
2, 753, 203
2, 719, 761
2, 724, 990
ALLOCATION TO ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
25 Other services...
2. 732, 320
2, 738, 400
1 Average number of persons: 1960, 16,051; 1961, 15,465; 1962, 15,410.
1961 estimate 1962 estimate
Total number of permanent positions.
18 155, 717 153, 100
6. 2 $5, 432 $5, 100
21 157.871 155, 228
6.3 $5,918 $5, 317
21 156, 325 156, 659
6.4 $5.930 $5, 328
Program by activities:
1. General expenses, Navy personnel.
Total, direct obligations..
1. General expenses, Navy personnel.
Total, reimbursable obligations...
Comparative transfers to other accounts.
services provided by Berlin Magistrat)
Military assistance orders.
2663, 2667, 6011; 22 U.S.C. 1816; and 40 U.S.C. 481(c)). l'nobligated balance carried forward (69 Stat. 438) Unobligated balance lapsing ....
New obligational authority..
“Emergency fund, Department of Defense" (73 Stat.
GENERAL STATEMENT OF DEPUTY CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
(LOGISTICS) Mr. Sikes. The committee is now ready to begin its hearings on "Operation and maintenance, Navy." We will begin these hearings with a summary statement by Vice Adm. John Sylvester. After the statement by Admiral Sylvester, we will have a special statement on the maintenance of facilities which will state how the Navy is progressing with a new system designed to account separately for the cost of maintaining its farflung physical plant. Following this presentation we will have a period of general questions pertaining to the whole of maintenance and operations, and then proceed with the separate presentations by Bureaus.
All right, Admiral Sylvester, will you proceed?