 | United States. Attorney General's National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws - 1955 - 416 lapas
...discretion is confined to consideration of whether in each case the conduct being reviewed under the Act constitutes an undue restraint of competitive...because, for example, of high fixed costs or the risks of "cutthroat" competition or other similar unusual conditions. •^(3) Certain forms of conduct, such... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee No. 5 - 1955 - 614 lapas
...discretion is confined to consideration of whether in each case the conduct being reviewed under the act constitutes an undue restraint of competitive...unreasonably anticompetitive in character or effect; if makes obsolete— this emphasis is mine, gentlemen, it does not appear in the report— Certain... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Select Committee on Small Business - 1955 - 344 lapas
...the act in the light of a broad public policy favoring competition and condemning iu'iuop:ily. * * * This standard permits the courts to decide whether...arguments, such as whether monopoly arrangements would be s ,cially preferable to competitiou in a particular industry, because, for example, of high fixed costs... | |
 | United States. Attorney General's National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws - 1955 - 420 lapas
...discretion is confined to consideration of whether in each case the conduct being reviewed under the Act constitutes an undue restraint of competitive...or a monopolization, or an attempt to monopolize. T^rH standard permits the courts to decide whether conduct is significantly and unreasonably anticompetitive... | |
 | United States. Attorney General's National Committee to Study the Antitrust Laws - 1955 - 418 lapas
...constitutes_an undue restraint of competitive conditions, or a mnnnpnlizatiori, nr an attempt to monopojize. This standard permits the courts to decide whether conduct is significantly and unreasonably antir.mnppt.itivft in character m- nflW.; it makes"1 obsolete once prevalent arguments, such as^_whether... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1971 - 1230 lapas
...the light of a broad public policy favoring competition and condemning monopoly," thereby enabling courts "to decide whether conduct is significantly...unreasonably anticompetitive in character or effect." * On the other hand, "[c]ertain forms of conduct . . . are 'conclusively presumed to be illegal, by... | |
 | Gerald R. Faulhaber, Gualtiero Tamburini - 1991 - 380 lapas
...study the Antitrust Law (1955), the standard adopted in the Standard Oil of New Jersey case (1911) "makes obsolete once prevalent arguments, such as,...because, for example, of high fixed costs, or the risk of cutthroat competition or other similar unusual conditions." See also Procter & Gamble (1967).... | |
| |
This standard permits the courts to decide whether conduct is significantly and unreasonably anticompetitive in character or effect; it makes obsolete once prevalent arguments, such as, whether monopoly arrangements would be socially preferable to competition... 