Hearings, Reports and Prints of the House Committee on Armed Services, 56-63. izdevumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1966 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
Admiral GILLETTE Air Force Base aircraft airlift requirements airlines airplane AMSA answer Army BATES believe BENNETT BIRCHARD bomber force BRAY capability cargo carriers Chairman Chiefs of Staff civilian CLIZBE combat Command committee Congress contract definition cost CRAF decision deferred deleted Department of Defense DISOSWAY engine equipment facilities fiscal year 1966 FISHER Fort Buchanan FOSTER going HALL HARDY HÉBERT IGNATIUS LEMAY LENNON MATS MCCONNELL McNamara ment million missiles mission MORGAN NAS Sanford Navy nuclear operations percent personnel phase PIRNIE PRICE procurement projects proposed Puerto Rico question replace requested Reserve Rutherford County RYAN Sanford SCHRIEVER SCHWEIKER Secretary BROWN Secretary CHARLES Secretary of Defense Secretary VANCE Sewart Air Force SLATINSHEK squadrons statement Strategic Air Command strategic bomber subcommittee tactical thing tion transportation U.S. Air Force U.S. Army units Vietnam weapons
Populāri fragmenti
6538. lappuse - I know that the Secretary of the Air Force and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force addressed that question.
6614. lappuse - Defense and industry participation in the costs of such development. 7. That purchase loan guarantee legislation, if proposed, contain provisions to insure the Immediate availability of cargo aircraft covered thereby to meet military and mobilization requirements. 8. That consideration be given to equipping certain Air Force Reserve and Air National Guard units with transport aircraft that might be available from MATS excesses as augmentation forces for MATS in time of emergency.
6313. lappuse - USC 1074 (a) provides that under joint regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, a member of...
6201. lappuse - I am quite sure that the Secretary of the Air Force, the Chief of Staff of the Air Force, and the rest of us are not thinking of a $100 million AMSA.
6363. lappuse - All adequate assets will not exceed 90 percent of requirements (80 percent in foreign countries). Assets include existing, authorized, and proposed onpost units as well as: leased units, adequate private rentals available for military use, private units occupied by military owners, and units occupied out of the area by families not desiring to move into the area. The...
6786. lappuse - C-5A's would be desirable in any event since a variety of vehicles with different capacities more nearly produce a uniform matching of capabilities and requirements. The C-141 could carry the denser cargo, thus making fuller use of its payload potential, while the C-5A could carry the bulky cargo. Furthermore, there will always be trips which will not require the very large capacity of a C-5A.
6093. lappuse - B-52G-IIs, we propose to undertake the necessary avionics development work to permit such a deployment if it should become desirable later. We would expect to keep the HOUND DOG missiles in the operational inventory through fiscal year 1970 on the same schedule as envisioned a year ago. However, in 1971. with the completion of the phaseout of the B-52C-Fs, the HOUND DOG force would be phased down accordingly.
6090. lappuse - Threat During the past year, the potential of an nth country nuclear threat to the United States has become more real and the feasibility of a moderately priced defense against it more promising. The Chinese Communists have detonated two nuclear devices and could possibly develop and deploy a small force of ICBM's by the mid to latter part of the 1970's.
6092. lappuse - B-52G-H's can be maintained in a satisfactory operational status at least through fiscal year 1975, and the modifications necessary to insure this have already been included in the proposed fiscal year 1967-71 program. As indicated in the foregoing analysis, a force of 255 operational B-52G-FTs would be sufficient to compel the Soviets to maintain their present antibomber defenses.
6081. lappuse - The strategic offensive forces can contribute to the damage-limiting objective by attacking enemy delivery vehicles on their bases or launch sites, provided that our forces can reach them before the vehicles are launched at our cities. Area defense forces can destroy enemy vehicles en route to their targets before they reach the target areas.