United States Supreme Court Reports, 45. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1976 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 83.
27. lappuse
... violations of § 610 to the Commission , and ( 2 ) derivative damage relief in a private cause of action by a stockholder to remedy a violation of § 610 was not available under § 610 itself , at least with regard to a violation of § 610 ...
... violations of § 610 to the Commission , and ( 2 ) derivative damage relief in a private cause of action by a stockholder to remedy a violation of § 610 was not available under § 610 itself , at least with regard to a violation of § 610 ...
30. lappuse
... violation of 18 USC § 610 [ 18 USCS 610 ] , which prohibits corpora- tions from making contributions or ex- penditures in connection with specified federal elections . Respondent alleged ju- risdiction under 28 USC § 1331 [ 28 USCS ...
... violation of 18 USC § 610 [ 18 USCS 610 ] , which prohibits corpora- tions from making contributions or ex- penditures in connection with specified federal elections . Respondent alleged ju- risdiction under 28 USC § 1331 [ 28 USCS ...
34. lappuse
... violation of § 610 , the controversy was not moot , although the election which occa- sioned it was past . The Court of Appeals held further that " a private cause of action , whether brought by a citizen to secure injunctive relief or ...
... violation of § 610 , the controversy was not moot , although the election which occa- sioned it was past . The Court of Appeals held further that " a private cause of action , whether brought by a citizen to secure injunctive relief or ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
15 USCS 28 USCS 42 USCS 45 L Ed 95 S Ct action aliens alleged annexation antitrust laws appellees applied argued the cause backpay banks checkpoint Circuit denied claim Clayton Act commerce Commission concurring Congress consideration or decision constitutional Cook Inlet corporation counsel Court of Appeals criminal defendant disclosure dissenting District Court evidence Exchange exclusionary rule exempt F Supp federal court filed Fourth Amendment Government held holding illegal infra issue judgment judicial June 16 June 23 jurisdiction jury trial Justice Douglas took L Ed 2d legislation ment Miranda warnings opinion ordinance overbreadth person Petition for writ petitioner plaintiffs proceedings prosecution provides purpose question rates reasonable regulations remanded respondent Securities Sherman Act sion Sixth Amendment Stat statement statute statutory supra Supreme Court tion tional titioner tive United States 422 United States Court violation writ of certiorari