United States Supreme Court Reports, 45. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1976 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 82.
96. lappuse
... result . Mr. Chief Justice Burger , with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins , dissenting . 1176 , 88 S Ct 2084 ( 1968 ) , Mr. Jus- tice Fortas observed that cases such as this call " not for the judgment of Solomon but for the dexterity of ...
... result . Mr. Chief Justice Burger , with whom Mr. Justice Douglas joins , dissenting . 1176 , 88 S Ct 2084 ( 1968 ) , Mr. Jus- tice Fortas observed that cases such as this call " not for the judgment of Solomon but for the dexterity of ...
369. lappuse
... result of these practices , vari- ous of the plaintiffs were affected in different ways . For example , plain- tiffs Ortiz , Reyes , Sinkler , and Bro- adnax , persons of low or moderate income and members of minority groups , alleged ...
... result of these practices , vari- ous of the plaintiffs were affected in different ways . For example , plain- tiffs Ortiz , Reyes , Sinkler , and Bro- adnax , persons of low or moderate income and members of minority groups , alleged ...
773. lappuse
... results of research in order that the unique investigative materials and research data in the possession of the government may result in improved prosthetic appliances for all disabled per- sons , actually encourages , rather than ...
... results of research in order that the unique investigative materials and research data in the possession of the government may result in improved prosthetic appliances for all disabled per- sons , actually encourages , rather than ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
15 USCS 28 USCS 42 USCS 45 L Ed 95 S Ct action aliens alleged annexation antitrust laws appellees applied argued the cause backpay banks checkpoint Circuit denied claim Clayton Act commerce Commission concurring Congress consideration or decision constitutional Cook Inlet corporation counsel Court of Appeals criminal defendant disclosure dissenting District Court evidence Exchange exclusionary rule exempt F Supp federal court filed Fourth Amendment Government held holding illegal infra issue judgment judicial June 16 June 23 jurisdiction jury trial Justice Douglas took L Ed 2d legislation ment Miranda warnings opinion ordinance overbreadth person Petition for writ petitioner plaintiffs proceedings prosecution provides purpose question rates reasonable regulations remanded respondent Securities Sherman Act sion Sixth Amendment Stat statement statute statutory supra Supreme Court tion tional titioner tive United States 422 United States Court violation writ of certiorari