United States Supreme Court Reports, 45. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1976 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 85.
211. lappuse
... rate was lawful and without itself prescribing any of the new rates . " This Court , after point- ing out the practical impossibility of inquiring into the reasonableness of each rate , stated : " [ I ] n performing the duty broadly to ...
... rate was lawful and without itself prescribing any of the new rates . " This Court , after point- ing out the practical impossibility of inquiring into the reasonableness of each rate , stated : " [ I ] n performing the duty broadly to ...
471. lappuse
... rates on the NYSE and Amex . After these two Exchanges had registered in 1934 under § 6 of the Exchange Act , 15 USC § 78f [ 15 USCS § 78f ] , both proceeded to prescribe minimum commission rates just as they had prior to the Act . App ...
... rates on the NYSE and Amex . After these two Exchanges had registered in 1934 under § 6 of the Exchange Act , 15 USC § 78f [ 15 USCS § 78f ] , both proceeded to prescribe minimum commission rates just as they had prior to the Act . App ...
476. lappuse
... rates , in fact , provided vari- ous subsidies that would be benefi- cial to the operation of the securities markets . For example , it was un- likely that small investors reaped a subsidy from higher rates charged larger investors ...
... rates , in fact , provided vari- ous subsidies that would be benefi- cial to the operation of the securities markets . For example , it was un- likely that small investors reaped a subsidy from higher rates charged larger investors ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
15 USCS 28 USCS 42 USCS 45 L Ed 95 S Ct action aliens alleged annexation antitrust laws appellees applied argued the cause backpay banks checkpoint Circuit denied claim Clayton Act commerce Commission concurring Congress consideration or decision constitutional Cook Inlet corporation counsel Court of Appeals criminal defendant disclosure dissenting District Court evidence Exchange exclusionary rule exempt F Supp federal court filed Fourth Amendment Government held holding illegal infra issue judgment judicial June 16 June 23 jurisdiction jury trial Justice Douglas took L Ed 2d legislation ment Miranda warnings opinion ordinance overbreadth person Petition for writ petitioner plaintiffs proceedings prosecution provides purpose question rates reasonable regulations remanded respondent Securities Sherman Act sion Sixth Amendment Stat statement statute statutory supra Supreme Court tion tional titioner tive United States 422 United States Court violation writ of certiorari