United States Supreme Court Reports, 45. sējumsLawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1976 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 82.
250. lappuse
... effect shall enact or seek to administer any voting qualifi- cation or prerequisite to voting , or standard , practice , or procedure with respect to voting different from that in force or effect on No- vember 1 , 1964 , or whenever a ...
... effect shall enact or seek to administer any voting qualifi- cation or prerequisite to voting , or standard , practice , or procedure with respect to voting different from that in force or effect on No- vember 1 , 1964 , or whenever a ...
257. lappuse
... effect of denying or abridging the right to vote within the meaning of § 5. To the extent that the District Court rested on a different view , its judg- ment cannot stand . 422 US 358 , 45 L Ed 2d 245 ,. III The foregoing principles ...
... effect of denying or abridging the right to vote within the meaning of § 5. To the extent that the District Court rested on a different view , its judg- ment cannot stand . 422 US 358 , 45 L Ed 2d 245 ,. III The foregoing principles ...
792. lappuse
... effect upon state courts. Heavy caseload of Supreme Court , effect of , $ 8 Introduction , § 1 Invasion of rights , § 4 Less weight than full opinion , view that deci- sions have , § 4 Little precedential value , view that decisions have ...
... effect upon state courts. Heavy caseload of Supreme Court , effect of , $ 8 Introduction , § 1 Invasion of rights , § 4 Less weight than full opinion , view that deci- sions have , § 4 Little precedential value , view that decisions have ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
15 USCS 28 USCS 42 USCS 45 L Ed 95 S Ct action aliens alleged annexation antitrust laws appellees applied argued the cause backpay banks checkpoint Circuit denied claim Clayton Act commerce Commission concurring Congress consideration or decision constitutional Cook Inlet corporation counsel Court of Appeals criminal defendant disclosure dissenting District Court evidence Exchange exclusionary rule exempt F Supp federal court filed Fourth Amendment Government held holding illegal infra issue judgment judicial June 16 June 23 jurisdiction jury trial Justice Douglas took L Ed 2d legislation ment Miranda warnings opinion ordinance overbreadth person Petition for writ petitioner plaintiffs proceedings prosecution provides purpose question rates reasonable regulations remanded respondent Securities Sherman Act sion Sixth Amendment Stat statement statute statutory supra Supreme Court tion tional titioner tive United States 422 United States Court violation writ of certiorari